Skip to content

Resistance per unit length value is less than what commercial tools give #2

Description

@ahmedmibrahim

I was building a similar quasi static solver and got stuck at why the calculated R per unit length value is less than what Polar Si9000e, Hyperlynx, ADS, or even Protoexpress (free online tool) gives. I get similar values like yours, and btw, if you solved the textbook structures (coaxial or twin pair), you will find your R value matching the equations. It seems commercial tools report a higher value for some reason, a value that's very similar to Rdc + Rac /// but no physical sense

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions