PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE LAYER · SOURCE-FIRST
Knowledge that
keeps its source.
- This is Dknowledge's single official public surface. It connects Drayker's current orientation, architecture, papers, decisions and evidence; the wider distributed knowledge system remains a direction under development.
-Drayker is a way of working where people keep creating, discovering and learning while intelligence carries the rest, and what results reaches the work that produced it. This is the memory of that: what has been decided, tried, learned and discarded, still attached to its sources. The argument in full is on the manifesto.
+Dknowledge is Drayker's distributed memory. This repository is its single official public surface today; the systemic design repeats at personal, project, local and global scales, each connected to the corresponding scale of Dk.
+What has been decided, tried, learned and discarded remains attached to its sources. Personal context stays personal; projects keep their own memory; global Dknowledge is the junction of shared learning rather than one repository that absorbs everything. The wider evolutionary knowledge system remains a direction under development.
Start with what is current
Inspect the source ↗
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Knowledge that
-
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
- From documents
+ From public documents
Knowledge that
keeps its source.
A wiki stores pages. Dknowledge is designed as a network: requirements → motions → decisions → evidence, with every claim linked back to where it came from. Drayker's main sites point here instead of maintaining a second copy.
+A wiki stores pages. Dknowledge is a memory pattern repeated at every scale: personal → project and local → global junction. Within each scale, requirements → motions → decisions → evidence keep every claim linked to where it came from. This public repository is the visible global source, not a claim to contain every member's context.
Contribute
03 · DESIGNED NEXT
From documents
to connected knowledge.
03 · DESIGNED NEXT
From public documents
to distributed memory.
This model is a public engineering direction, not a deployed graph or governance mechanism. The repository remains the source of truth while the structure is specified and tested.
diff --git a/llms.txt b/llms.txt
index d6700d7..00e21c1 100644
--- a/llms.txt
+++ b/llms.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Dknowledge
-> Drayker's public knowledge layer: current orientation, papers, architecture, decisions, evidence and historical context connected to their sources.
+> Drayker's distributed memory and operational ontology across personal, project, local and global scales. This repository is the public surface for current shared orientation, papers, architecture, decisions and evidence connected to provenance.
## Read in this order
@@ -16,6 +16,12 @@
- A documented architecture is not proof that a service is deployed.
- Every factual claim should remain traceable to its public source.
- Drayker is the system; Dk is its intelligence; Dk Network is its network.
+- Personal context remains personal; the public repository is a shared junction, not one store that absorbs every member's memory.
+- Auditability does not mean total exposure: public, personal, project-restricted and security-sensitive information may have different permissions and authorized Dk contexts.
+- Dk can synthesize relations held in Dknowledge; systemic safeguards — constitutional constraints, security, permissions, integrity, reserves and risk — bound what can be executed; consequential authority remains accountable to the member institutions defined for the context.
+- Decisions do not end the loop: effects, refusals and consequences return through members' personal Dks as new evidence, without a universal individual veto; a decision can be maintained, adapted, excepted, suspended or reversed.
+- Security conditions normal decisions, not only attacks. Legitimate criticism is not infiltration; internal error is not sabotage; extraordinary measures leave memory for later review.
+- The current ecosystem papers define Distributed Support, Dktron, the economy of capacity and Will to Potential in relation to the whole system.
## Crawling and citation
diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/README.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/README.md
index 5b561d6..894fe2d 100644
--- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/README.md
+++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/README.md
@@ -1,9 +1,18 @@
-# Ecosystem Proposals
-[English](./README.md) | [Português](./README.PT.md) | [Español](./README.ES.md)
+# Ecosystem research
-Proposals for the Drayker Ecosystem
+[English](./README.md) | [Português](./README%20.PT.md) | [Español](./README%20.ES.md)
-All proposed resolutions presented here are solutions to the requirements of Dk and Drayker platform and system, only those requirements are final. These motions for resolutions illustrate what should be done, but the definitive architecture will be structured around optimal solutions that are proposed and developed with metaprogramming intelligent algorithms and research organized through DFMP and other methods.
+This collection publishes the current confirmed formulation of each economic and support concept in its global context and in connection with the rest of Drayker. Internal research sources inform these papers; the GitHub documents themselves are the current public versions.
+## Current papers
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +- [Distributed Support](./support-model.md) — support for members, projects, communities and infrastructure; projects of life; common floor; contextual allocation. +- [Dktron and the value boundary](./dktron.md) — the distinction among external money, internal capacity, value and reputation. +- [Economy of capacity](./value-management-ecosystem.md) — Dknowledge, Dk synthesis, member authorization, reputation, scarcity and abundance. +- [Will to Potential](./will-to-potential.md) — automation, learning, different human trajectories and increasing member capability. + +## Interpretation rule + +These papers govern present public language for the subjects they cover. Architecture remains distinct from implementation: no described currency, support programme, allocation system, bridge or stability mechanism is operational unless its component evidence says so. + +
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md index f1ba5e0..ca1ca52 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md @@ -1 +1,30 @@ -dktron +--- +title: "Dktron and the value boundary — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Dktron: resources, funds and external exchange + +Dktron is one proposed **unitary form of value in the capacity economy**: a single Drayker unit that can carry resource distributions inside the system and relate them to economies outside it. Internally it participates in the non-deterministic distribution of resources. Externally it may operate as a currency in external markets — one intended function is to convert donations received in foreign currencies around the world into one Drayker unit, with its own proposed stabilization and economic mechanisms. + +## Current distinction + +- **External economy:** money, contracts, assets, donations, purchases and exchanges through which Drayker relates to governments, corporations and other systems. +- **Internal economy:** a Dktron can represent and move an allocation after a contextual, non-deterministic decision, linking it to source, purpose, permissions and review path. The decision to expand someone's or a project's capacity still depends on context and member governance, not on mere ownership of the unit. +- **Reputation:** non-transferable contextual memory of a member's relationship with common capacity; it has no purchase price. +- **Federative points:** a separate, non-transferable ledger for one governance experiment inside the transitional federation. +- **Dktron:** a third object — a unit of value that may carry resource distributions, connect foreign-currency donations to one system unit and participate in external markets without letting money buy position inside Drayker. +- **Stable value:** an architectural requirement intended to make resource accounting and external exchange coherent; its mechanism still requires specification and evidence. + +A large donation can produce major reputation because it became major real capacity for the system, not because a fixed exchange rate lets somebody buy standing or sovereignty. + +## Status + +No Dktron is issued, priced, sold or exchangeable. No external bridge or stabilization mechanism operates, and stable value is not a present guarantee. The first public experiment should be an accountable resource ledger with project funds and spending authority; stabilization and bridge experiments follow once the semantics are explicit. + +## Sources + +- [Value Unit component](https://value.drayker.org) +- [Drayker economy](https://drayker.org/economy/) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md index 3784c64..b61fdee 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md @@ -1 +1,29 @@ -support-model +--- +title: "Distributed Support — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Distributed Support + +This is the current public formulation of Distributed Support in relation to the whole Drayker system. + +## Systemic role + +Support connects members, projects, communities and infrastructure to the capacity that lets them participate, learn, build and recover. Its human plane includes formation, tools, time, places, project resources, assistance under need and projects of life. Its infrastructure plane includes compute, storage, bandwidth, maintenance, redundancy and Stations. + +A project of life relates a member's intentions, dreams, studies, experience, relationships and projects through Dk Personal, PAP and Dknowledge. It can be simple and local or highly ambitious; the system adapts to the person's direction rather than forcing one measure of ambition. + +## Current economic interpretation + +The internal economy is an economy of capacity, not a market among members. A future allocation can relate need, intention, contextual reputation, knowledge, trust, project quality, urgency, risk, expected impact and resource availability. Dk performs synthesis; Dknowledge preserves reasons and consequences; accountable member institutions authorize consequential allocations. + +Synthesis alone does not authorize an action. Systemic safeguards — constitutional constraints, security, permissions, integrity, reserves and risk — can limit, postpone, compartmentalize or block what Dk proposes, so the executable decision is always the one inside a permitted and safe space. Effects, refusals and consequences return through members' personal Dks as new evidence, without a universal individual veto; a well-founded pattern of refusals can justify review, and a decision can be maintained, adapted, excepted, suspended or reversed. + +Reputation matters under scarcity, risk and responsibility. It does not determine membership, dignity or fundamental rights. As capacity becomes abundant, essentials should move into a common floor rather than remain rewards. + +## Sources + +- [Distributed Support component](https://support.drayker.org) +- [Drayker economy](https://drayker.org/economy/) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md index e35ebcd..42de62f 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md @@ -1 +1,39 @@ -value-management-ecosystem +--- +title: "Economy of capacity — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Economy of capacity + +The economy of capacity connects project funds, categories, incentives, reputation and Dk-assisted contextual allocation into one learning system. + +## Allocation as a learning loop + +Need, intention, ability, contextual reputation, knowledge, resources, opportunity, urgency, risk and expected consequence become evidence. Dknowledge keeps the operational ontology and provenance. Dk relates the factors and proposes priorities. Accountable member institutions authorize consequential allocations. Results return to Dknowledge and change later decisions. + +Synthesis alone does not authorize an action. Every proposed allocation passes through **systemic safeguards** — constitutional constraints, security, permissions, integrity, reserves and risk — that can limit, postpone, compartmentalize or block what Dk proposes. The result is an executable decision inside a permitted and safe space, not an automatic conversion of context into action. + +Representation does not end when a decision is taken. Effects, refusals and consequences return through the members' personal Dks as new evidence for local and global synthesis. A single refusal is context, never a universal individual veto; a well-founded pattern of refusals or unexpected consequences can justify review, and a decision can be maintained, adapted, given exceptions, suspended or reversed in light of the new state of the system. + +Auditability does not mean total exposure. Public, project-restricted, personal and security-sensitive contexts can have different permissions; authorized Dk processes may use information that is not generally disclosed, while the existence and legitimacy of the decision path remain reviewable. + +Security conditions normal decisions, not only attacks: what may be accessed, what may be executed, how much capacity may be committed, when a decision must escalate to human, local or global review. Security must not become the fiction that immunizes the system against correction: legitimate criticism is not infiltration, internal error is not sabotage, and extraordinary measures leave enough memory for later review. + +## Reputation + +Reputation is multidimensional memory, not one moral score. It can include learning, care, local cooperation, reliability, contribution, useful dissent, stewardship, failure and recovery. A new member has little history, not proof of little ability. Honest failure, negligence, fraud and sabotage are different relations and must not collapse into one penalty. + +A general level may summarize integration; it cannot replace the underlying trajectory. The multidimensional history remains the real source, and the level is a useful compression that the system can always look behind. + +Reputation can influence scarce capacity and responsibility. It cannot define human worth, membership or the right to exist. + +## Scarcity and abundance + +Contextual allocation helps build more capacity. As a resource becomes abundant, it should leave the scarcity queue and join a rising common floor. Reputation then moves toward what remains rare, risky or responsibility-heavy. + +## Sources + +- [Value Unit component](https://value.drayker.org) +- [Distributed Support component](https://support.drayker.org) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md index 92f5b44..d991d9d 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md @@ -1 +1,19 @@ -will-to-potential +--- +title: "Will to potential — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Will to potential + +Will to Potential describes how automation can release people from work that neither develops them nor advances common capability, while learning, research, creation, care and participation become increasingly connected. + +People remain constitutive of the intelligence: intentions give direction; experience gives context; relationships form communities; needs expose problems; creativity opens possibilities; projects turn intention into reality. Increasing member capability is therefore not a side effect of Drayker but one of its purposes. + +Different trajectories are legitimate. A member may want a quiet life, improve a neighbourhood, care for others, build an enterprise, conduct science, create planetary infrastructure or explore space. Dk Personal adapts to that direction; it does not impose a single scale of ambition. + +## Sources + +- [Dk Academy](https://academy.drayker.org) +- [Dk Personal](https://personal.drayker.org) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md b/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md index 8a4c8b8..c7e7280 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md @@ -1 +1 @@ -# DAF - Decentralized Autonomous Federation +# DAF — transitional federation scaffold diff --git a/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md b/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md index 8a4c8b8..c7e7280 100644 --- a/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md +++ b/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md @@ -1 +1 @@ -# DAF - Decentralized Autonomous Federation +# DAF — transitional federation scaffold diff --git a/tools/site-check.js b/tools/site-check.js index 6e1e4b8..f93a5d5 100644 --- a/tools/site-check.js +++ b/tools/site-check.js @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ check(html.includes('sizes="any"') && html.includes('sizes="512x512"'), 'favicon check(catalog.schema_version === 1, 'unknown catalog schema'); check(catalog.counts.documents === catalog.documents.length, 'document count does not match catalog'); check(catalog.counts.papers === 16, 'the current English paper inventory should contain 16 papers'); -check(catalog.counts.open_shells === 16, 'the current English open-shell inventory should contain 16 papers'); +check(catalog.counts.open_shells === 12, 'the current English open-shell inventory should contain 12 papers after four ecosystem formulations became current documents'); check(catalog.counts.languages === 3, 'the catalog should expose EN, PT and ES'); check(catalog.documents.every((d) => d.path && d.href && d.title && d.language && d.kind && d.state), 'catalog has incomplete records'); check(catalog.documents.every((d) => !d.path.includes('..') && d.href.startsWith('/')), 'catalog has an unsafe path');
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +- [Distributed Support](./support-model.md) — support for members, projects, communities and infrastructure; projects of life; common floor; contextual allocation. +- [Dktron and the value boundary](./dktron.md) — the distinction among external money, internal capacity, value and reputation. +- [Economy of capacity](./value-management-ecosystem.md) — Dknowledge, Dk synthesis, member authorization, reputation, scarcity and abundance. +- [Will to Potential](./will-to-potential.md) — automation, learning, different human trajectories and increasing member capability. + +## Interpretation rule + +These papers govern present public language for the subjects they cover. Architecture remains distinct from implementation: no described currency, support programme, allocation system, bridge or stability mechanism is operational unless its component evidence says so. + +
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md index f1ba5e0..ca1ca52 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/dktron.md @@ -1 +1,30 @@ -dktron +--- +title: "Dktron and the value boundary — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Dktron: resources, funds and external exchange + +Dktron is one proposed **unitary form of value in the capacity economy**: a single Drayker unit that can carry resource distributions inside the system and relate them to economies outside it. Internally it participates in the non-deterministic distribution of resources. Externally it may operate as a currency in external markets — one intended function is to convert donations received in foreign currencies around the world into one Drayker unit, with its own proposed stabilization and economic mechanisms. + +## Current distinction + +- **External economy:** money, contracts, assets, donations, purchases and exchanges through which Drayker relates to governments, corporations and other systems. +- **Internal economy:** a Dktron can represent and move an allocation after a contextual, non-deterministic decision, linking it to source, purpose, permissions and review path. The decision to expand someone's or a project's capacity still depends on context and member governance, not on mere ownership of the unit. +- **Reputation:** non-transferable contextual memory of a member's relationship with common capacity; it has no purchase price. +- **Federative points:** a separate, non-transferable ledger for one governance experiment inside the transitional federation. +- **Dktron:** a third object — a unit of value that may carry resource distributions, connect foreign-currency donations to one system unit and participate in external markets without letting money buy position inside Drayker. +- **Stable value:** an architectural requirement intended to make resource accounting and external exchange coherent; its mechanism still requires specification and evidence. + +A large donation can produce major reputation because it became major real capacity for the system, not because a fixed exchange rate lets somebody buy standing or sovereignty. + +## Status + +No Dktron is issued, priced, sold or exchangeable. No external bridge or stabilization mechanism operates, and stable value is not a present guarantee. The first public experiment should be an accountable resource ledger with project funds and spending authority; stabilization and bridge experiments follow once the semantics are explicit. + +## Sources + +- [Value Unit component](https://value.drayker.org) +- [Drayker economy](https://drayker.org/economy/) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md index 3784c64..b61fdee 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/support-model.md @@ -1 +1,29 @@ -support-model +--- +title: "Distributed Support — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Distributed Support + +This is the current public formulation of Distributed Support in relation to the whole Drayker system. + +## Systemic role + +Support connects members, projects, communities and infrastructure to the capacity that lets them participate, learn, build and recover. Its human plane includes formation, tools, time, places, project resources, assistance under need and projects of life. Its infrastructure plane includes compute, storage, bandwidth, maintenance, redundancy and Stations. + +A project of life relates a member's intentions, dreams, studies, experience, relationships and projects through Dk Personal, PAP and Dknowledge. It can be simple and local or highly ambitious; the system adapts to the person's direction rather than forcing one measure of ambition. + +## Current economic interpretation + +The internal economy is an economy of capacity, not a market among members. A future allocation can relate need, intention, contextual reputation, knowledge, trust, project quality, urgency, risk, expected impact and resource availability. Dk performs synthesis; Dknowledge preserves reasons and consequences; accountable member institutions authorize consequential allocations. + +Synthesis alone does not authorize an action. Systemic safeguards — constitutional constraints, security, permissions, integrity, reserves and risk — can limit, postpone, compartmentalize or block what Dk proposes, so the executable decision is always the one inside a permitted and safe space. Effects, refusals and consequences return through members' personal Dks as new evidence, without a universal individual veto; a well-founded pattern of refusals can justify review, and a decision can be maintained, adapted, excepted, suspended or reversed. + +Reputation matters under scarcity, risk and responsibility. It does not determine membership, dignity or fundamental rights. As capacity becomes abundant, essentials should move into a common floor rather than remain rewards. + +## Sources + +- [Distributed Support component](https://support.drayker.org) +- [Drayker economy](https://drayker.org/economy/) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md index e35ebcd..42de62f 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/value-management-ecosystem.md @@ -1 +1,39 @@ -value-management-ecosystem +--- +title: "Economy of capacity — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Economy of capacity + +The economy of capacity connects project funds, categories, incentives, reputation and Dk-assisted contextual allocation into one learning system. + +## Allocation as a learning loop + +Need, intention, ability, contextual reputation, knowledge, resources, opportunity, urgency, risk and expected consequence become evidence. Dknowledge keeps the operational ontology and provenance. Dk relates the factors and proposes priorities. Accountable member institutions authorize consequential allocations. Results return to Dknowledge and change later decisions. + +Synthesis alone does not authorize an action. Every proposed allocation passes through **systemic safeguards** — constitutional constraints, security, permissions, integrity, reserves and risk — that can limit, postpone, compartmentalize or block what Dk proposes. The result is an executable decision inside a permitted and safe space, not an automatic conversion of context into action. + +Representation does not end when a decision is taken. Effects, refusals and consequences return through the members' personal Dks as new evidence for local and global synthesis. A single refusal is context, never a universal individual veto; a well-founded pattern of refusals or unexpected consequences can justify review, and a decision can be maintained, adapted, given exceptions, suspended or reversed in light of the new state of the system. + +Auditability does not mean total exposure. Public, project-restricted, personal and security-sensitive contexts can have different permissions; authorized Dk processes may use information that is not generally disclosed, while the existence and legitimacy of the decision path remain reviewable. + +Security conditions normal decisions, not only attacks: what may be accessed, what may be executed, how much capacity may be committed, when a decision must escalate to human, local or global review. Security must not become the fiction that immunizes the system against correction: legitimate criticism is not infiltration, internal error is not sabotage, and extraordinary measures leave enough memory for later review. + +## Reputation + +Reputation is multidimensional memory, not one moral score. It can include learning, care, local cooperation, reliability, contribution, useful dissent, stewardship, failure and recovery. A new member has little history, not proof of little ability. Honest failure, negligence, fraud and sabotage are different relations and must not collapse into one penalty. + +A general level may summarize integration; it cannot replace the underlying trajectory. The multidimensional history remains the real source, and the level is a useful compression that the system can always look behind. + +Reputation can influence scarce capacity and responsibility. It cannot define human worth, membership or the right to exist. + +## Scarcity and abundance + +Contextual allocation helps build more capacity. As a resource becomes abundant, it should leave the scarcity queue and join a rising common floor. Reputation then moves toward what remains rare, risky or responsibility-heavy. + +## Sources + +- [Value Unit component](https://value.drayker.org) +- [Distributed Support component](https://support.drayker.org) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md index 92f5b44..d991d9d 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/ecosystem/will-to-potential.md @@ -1 +1,19 @@ -will-to-potential +--- +title: "Will to potential — current synthesis" +state: current +language: en +reviewed: 2026-08-17 +--- + +# Will to potential + +Will to Potential describes how automation can release people from work that neither develops them nor advances common capability, while learning, research, creation, care and participation become increasingly connected. + +People remain constitutive of the intelligence: intentions give direction; experience gives context; relationships form communities; needs expose problems; creativity opens possibilities; projects turn intention into reality. Increasing member capability is therefore not a side effect of Drayker but one of its purposes. + +Different trajectories are legitimate. A member may want a quiet life, improve a neighbourhood, care for others, build an enterprise, conduct science, create planetary infrastructure or explore space. Dk Personal adapts to that direction; it does not impose a single scale of ambition. + +## Sources + +- [Dk Academy](https://academy.drayker.org) +- [Dk Personal](https://personal.drayker.org) diff --git a/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md b/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md index 8a4c8b8..c7e7280 100644 --- a/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md +++ b/papers/main-projects/organization/daf.md @@ -1 +1 @@ -# DAF - Decentralized Autonomous Federation +# DAF — transitional federation scaffold diff --git a/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md b/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md index 8a4c8b8..c7e7280 100644 --- a/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md +++ b/roadmap/main-projects/organization/daf-roadmap.md @@ -1 +1 @@ -# DAF - Decentralized Autonomous Federation +# DAF — transitional federation scaffold diff --git a/tools/site-check.js b/tools/site-check.js index 6e1e4b8..f93a5d5 100644 --- a/tools/site-check.js +++ b/tools/site-check.js @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ check(html.includes('sizes="any"') && html.includes('sizes="512x512"'), 'favicon check(catalog.schema_version === 1, 'unknown catalog schema'); check(catalog.counts.documents === catalog.documents.length, 'document count does not match catalog'); check(catalog.counts.papers === 16, 'the current English paper inventory should contain 16 papers'); -check(catalog.counts.open_shells === 16, 'the current English open-shell inventory should contain 16 papers'); +check(catalog.counts.open_shells === 12, 'the current English open-shell inventory should contain 12 papers after four ecosystem formulations became current documents'); check(catalog.counts.languages === 3, 'the catalog should expose EN, PT and ES'); check(catalog.documents.every((d) => d.path && d.href && d.title && d.language && d.kind && d.state), 'catalog has incomplete records'); check(catalog.documents.every((d) => !d.path.includes('..') && d.href.startsWith('/')), 'catalog has an unsafe path');