Replies: 1 comment
|
I think it would be better if the list included all providers so that people could leave a review for any of them and thereby help others avoid scams. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
hello
i'm a fan of this repository and i appreciate your continued contributions to the list that you maintain here
however one thing that I noticed recently is that you've been adding too many paid providers and when I check their websites they either look suspicious (bad reviews) or their domains (on a WHOIS lookup) were registered very recently (like 2 months ago)
and some of the providers that you added recently are even spam
for example check iptv-org/awesome-iptv#1002 and iptv-org/awesome-iptv#996
they are advertised as completely different providers but both websites offer the exact same service in the end and are owned by the same people
this provider's domain was registered a few months ago
iptv-org/awesome-iptv#870
iptv-org/awesome-iptv#785
and there are too many duplicates, for example check:
iptv-org/awesome-iptv#870
iptv-org/awesome-iptv#802
to be honest the list was much cleaner when it was all on the README before this new discussions style
don't get me wrong, I like the discussions style as well, but what i'm trying to say is that you guys should review new submissions better before the list becomes more messy and it gets harder to moderate
every month hundreds of new IPTV providers appear and they just want to make money for a few months then they exit scam and leave clients without their money and without a tV service, which is why i'm suggesting putting rules before accepting new paid providers on the list
for example:
or maybe move the paid providers to a completely different category so the free ones are more visible
All reactions