Nice to have: options ordered from best to worst

[ThomasCabaret]

Hi, we can have this kind of display (see below).
It would be good to have it sorted and labelled accordingly.

A -> Win%: 49.01% (8200 visits)
B -> Win%: 47.03% (12611 visits)
C -> Win%: 46.78% (5269 visits)
D -> Win%: 47.38% (4509 visits)
E -> Win%: 46.98% (4082 visits)
F -> Win%: 44.97% (1787 visits)
G -> Win%: 46.81% (736 visits)

[lightvector]

No, I think changing the sorting is not a good idea. This is the order that Leela returns the moves, which as far as I can tell is the order that Leela actually prefers the moves in. If I recall correctly from watching the analysis window during interactive with Leela in the GUI version, Leela neither strictly uses highest visit count (which is influenced by the policy net) nor uses the highest winrate (which comes from the value net and playouts) when choosing a move, but rather uses a combination of them. So maybe it looks unsorted but this is actually Leela's order of preference of all the moves.

…

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:09 AM, ThomasCabaret ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, we can have this kind of display (see below). It would be good to have it sorted and labelled accordingly. A -> Win%: 49.01% (8200 visits) B -> Win%: 47.03% (12611 visits) C -> Win%: 46.78% (5269 visits) D -> Win%: 47.38% (4509 visits) E -> Win%: 46.98% (4082 visits) F -> Win%: 44.97% (1787 visits) G -> Win%: 46.81% (736 visits) — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#11>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALY5-9-6aurGASfOJhLZ5rGJzGFP4R1Oks5tNeghgaJpZM4Rps5K> .