diff --git a/docs/.vitepress/config/theme.mts b/docs/.vitepress/config/theme.mts
index e88733c42..0a6400b5a 100644
--- a/docs/.vitepress/config/theme.mts
+++ b/docs/.vitepress/config/theme.mts
@@ -59,6 +59,17 @@ const defaultSidebar = [
       { text: "Zed", link: "/integrations/editors/zed" },
     ],
   },
+  {
+    text: "CI Integrations",
+    collapsed: false,
+    items: [
+      { text: "Overview", link: "/integrations/ci" },
+      { text: "GitHub Actions", link: "/integrations/ci/github-actions" },
+      { text: "GitLab CI", link: "/integrations/ci/gitlab" },
+      { text: "Bitbucket Pipelines", link: "/integrations/ci/bitbucket" },
+      { text: "Reviewdog", link: "/integrations/ci/reviewdog" },
+    ],
+  },
   {
     text: "Language Bindings",
     collapsed: false,
diff --git a/docs/docs/integrations/ci.md b/docs/docs/integrations/ci.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b50f7dc5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/docs/integrations/ci.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Using Herb in CI
+
+Run the Herb [Linter](/projects/linter), [Formatter](/projects/formatter), and parser [analyzer](/bindings/ruby/reference) as part of your CI pipeline to keep HTML+ERB templates consistent and catch regressions on every push.
+
+## Available Integrations
+
+- **[GitHub Actions](/integrations/ci/github-actions)** - Inline PR annotations are enabled automatically
+- **[GitLab CI](/integrations/ci/gitlab)** - Runs in any Node or Ruby image; optional Code Quality report
+- **[Bitbucket Pipelines](/integrations/ci/bitbucket)** - Parallel lint, format, and analyze steps
+- **[Reviewdog](/integrations/ci/reviewdog)** - Post linter findings as inline review comments
+
+See the [Linter](/projects/linter) and [Formatter](/projects/formatter) docs for the full list of CLI flags available in each snippet.
diff --git a/docs/docs/integrations/ci/bitbucket.md b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/bitbucket.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5538cdd1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/bitbucket.md
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+title: Using Herb with Bitbucket Pipelines
+---
+
+# Bitbucket Pipelines
+
+Run lint, format check, and analyzer as parallel steps.
+
+::: warning Formatter is in experimental preview
+`@herb-tools/formatter` is in early development, and `--check` will fail on any codebase that hasn't already been run through `herb-format`. Run `npx --yes @herb-tools/formatter app/views` once and commit the result before enabling the format step.
+:::
+
+```yaml [bitbucket-pipelines.yml]
+image: node:20
+
+pipelines:
+  default:
+    - parallel:
+        - step:
+            name: Herb Lint
+            script:
+              - npx --yes @herb-tools/linter --fail-level warning
+        - step:
+            name: Herb Format Check
+            script:
+              - npx --yes @herb-tools/formatter --check app/views
+        - step:
+            name: Herb Analyze
+            image: ruby:3.3
+            script:
+              - gem install herb
+              - herb analyze .
+```
diff --git a/docs/docs/integrations/ci/github-actions.md b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/github-actions.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..75690d3dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/github-actions.md
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+---
+title: Using Herb with GitHub Actions
+---
+
+# GitHub Actions
+
+The linter auto-detects GitHub Actions via the `GITHUB_ACTIONS` environment variable and emits inline PR annotations by default — no extra flag required.
+
+## Lint + Format check
+
+```yaml [.github/workflows/herb.yml]
+name: Herb
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
+  pull_request:
+
+jobs:
+  herb:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
+        with:
+          node-version: 20
+
+      - name: Lint HTML+ERB templates
+        run: npx --yes @herb-tools/linter
+
+      - name: Check HTML+ERB formatting
+        run: npx --yes @herb-tools/formatter --check app/views
+```
+
+The formatter requires an explicit path in CI — without one it reads from stdin, which `--check` rejects. Adjust `app/views` to match where your templates live.
+
+::: warning Formatter is in experimental preview
+`@herb-tools/formatter` prints an experimental-preview banner on every invocation, and `--check` will fail on any codebase that hasn't already been run through `herb-format`. Before wiring this step into CI, see [Adopting the formatter](#adopting-the-formatter) below.
+:::
+
+## Adopting the formatter
+
+`--check` only passes on an already-formatted tree. Run the formatter once, commit the result in its own change, then enable the CI step:
+
+```bash
+npx --yes @herb-tools/formatter app/views
+```
+
+Review the diff, commit it separately from unrelated changes, and only then add the `--check` step to your workflow.
+
+## Stricter lint gate
+
+Fail the build on warnings in addition to errors:
+
+```yaml
+- name: Lint HTML+ERB templates
+  run: npx --yes @herb-tools/linter --fail-level warning
+```
+
+## Parser analysis (Ruby)
+
+`herb analyze` reports how many templates parse cleanly and exits non-zero when any issue is detected (see `lib/herb/cli.rb`), so it can gate the build on its own.
+
+Append these steps to the `herb` job above to also run the parser analyzer, or put them in a separate job if you prefer to parallelize:
+
+```yaml
+- uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
+  with:
+    bundler-cache: true
+
+- name: Analyze HTML+ERB templates
+  run: bundle exec herb analyze .
+```
+
+::: tip
+If your project doesn't have `herb` in its `Gemfile`, replace `bundle exec herb` with `gem install herb && herb analyze .`, and drop `bundler-cache: true` from `ruby/setup-ruby` unless another step in the job needs it.
+:::
+
+## See also
+
+- [Reviewdog](/integrations/ci/reviewdog) — post linter findings as inline PR review comments
diff --git a/docs/docs/integrations/ci/gitlab.md b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/gitlab.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..27fca7901
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/gitlab.md
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+---
+title: Using Herb with GitLab CI
+---
+
+# GitLab CI
+
+GitLab doesn't consume GitHub-style annotations, so pass `--no-github` to keep output readable in job logs.
+
+## Lint, format, and analyze
+
+```yaml [.gitlab-ci.yml]
+herb:lint:
+  image: node:20
+  script:
+    - npx --yes @herb-tools/linter --no-github --fail-level warning
+
+herb:format:
+  image: node:20
+  script:
+    - npx --yes @herb-tools/formatter --check app/views
+
+herb:analyze:
+  image: ruby:3.3
+  script:
+    - gem install herb
+    - herb analyze .
+```
+
+`herb analyze` exits non-zero when issues are detected, so no extra gating is needed.
+
+::: warning Formatter is in experimental preview
+`@herb-tools/formatter` is in early development, and `--check` will fail on any codebase that hasn't already been run through `herb-format`. Run `npx --yes @herb-tools/formatter app/views` once and commit the result before enabling the `herb:format` job.
+:::
+
+## Code Quality report
+
+GitLab's [Code Quality report](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/testing/code_quality.html) expects a specific JSON schema (`description`, `check_name`, `fingerprint`, `severity`, `location.path`, `location.lines.begin`). The linter's `--json` output isn't in that shape, so transform it with `jq`:
+
+```yaml
+herb:lint:
+  image: node:20
+  before_script:
+    - apt-get update && apt-get install -y jq
+  script:
+    - npx --yes @herb-tools/linter --no-github --json > herb-lint.raw.json || true
+    - |
+      jq '[ .offenses[] | {
+        description: .message,
+        check_name: .code,
+        fingerprint: (.filename + ":" + .code + ":" + (.location.start.line|tostring) + ":" + (.location.start.column|tostring)),
+        severity: (if .severity == "error" then "major" elif .severity == "warning" then "minor" else "info" end),
+        location: { path: .filename, lines: { begin: .location.start.line } }
+      }]' herb-lint.raw.json > gl-code-quality-report.json
+  artifacts:
+    when: always
+    reports:
+      codequality: gl-code-quality-report.json
+```
+
+The `|| true` keeps the job running so the `jq` step still emits the report when the linter exits non-zero. Fail the pipeline on findings in a separate job if you want gating.
diff --git a/docs/docs/integrations/ci/reviewdog.md b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/reviewdog.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2aabaa72f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/docs/integrations/ci/reviewdog.md
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+---
+title: Using Herb with Reviewdog
+---
+
+# Reviewdog
+
+[Reviewdog](https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog) posts linter findings as inline review comments on pull and merge requests across GitHub, GitLab, and other providers.
+
+The linter's `--format=simple` output is human-oriented (file on one line, then indented `line:col  message`) and isn't well-suited to reviewdog's `errorformat` parser. Use `--json` and transform it to [`rdjson`](https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#rdjson) with `jq` instead — the JSON shape is documented in the [Linter README](/projects/linter) and source of truth for the transform below.
+
+## GitHub Actions
+
+```yaml [.github/workflows/herb-reviewdog.yml]
+name: Herb (reviewdog)
+
+on: [pull_request]
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: write
+  checks: write
+
+jobs:
+  herb:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
+        with:
+          node-version: 20
+      - uses: reviewdog/action-setup@v1
+
+      - name: Run Herb linter via reviewdog
+        env:
+          REVIEWDOG_GITHUB_API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+        run: |
+          npx --yes @herb-tools/linter --no-github --json \
+            | jq '{
+                source: { name: "herb-lint" },
+                diagnostics: [ .offenses[] | {
+                  message: .message,
+                  location: {
+                    path: .filename,
+                    range: {
+                      start: { line: .location.start.line, column: .location.start.column },
+                      end:   { line: .location.end.line,   column: .location.end.column }
+                    }
+                  },
+                  severity: (.severity | ascii_upcase),
+                  code: { value: .code }
+                }]
+              }' \
+            | reviewdog -f=rdjson -name="herb-lint" -reporter=github-pr-review -fail-level=error
+```
+
+::: tip
+The linter exits non-zero when offenses are found, but reviewdog's own `-fail-level` is what decides whether the CI step fails. Bash pipelines return the last command's exit code by default, so reviewdog's exit code wins.
+:::
+
+## Severity mapping
+
+The linter emits `error`, `warning`, `info`, and `hint` severities. Reviewdog's `rdjson` accepts `ERROR`, `WARNING`, and `INFO`. The jq snippet above uppercases the severity string directly, which works for `error`/`warning`/`info`; `hint` is not a valid rdjson severity and will be rejected. If you use hint-level rules, map them explicitly:
+
+```jq
+severity: (
+  if   .severity == "error"   then "ERROR"
+  elif .severity == "warning" then "WARNING"
+  else "INFO" end
+)
+```