You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Commit faea09b
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
doc: map the removal of portb's host input in the OpenVMM roadmap
Record the two commits that the previous commit pins as positions 212
and 213 of the microVM chain, and move the NVX pin to 4713c539a.
microsoft/openvmm#4887 proposes position 213 for feature/microvm/dev on
position 212, de29849a4, which microsoft/openvmm#4886 proposes as one
commit on position 211, 5aa8b0285, which microsoft/openvmm#4894
proposes on position 210, eda13d80a, the head of
feature/microvm/release/v4.0, to which feature/microvm/dev also points.
The pin is now 78 commits past the mapped tip, and positions 212 and
213 join the unassigned positions 136-213.
Position 212 makes the guests of the microVM VMM tests run without
portb's host input and removes the petri harness's input. Position 213
removes that input from portb: its receive buffer, its gating, and its
input-pending status bit, while a restore refuses saved state that
holds host input and the CLI gives portb no console input; the device
now polls its backend for a departed peer, which its reads used to
notice. Both follow the v4.0 reorganization, so they combine no earlier
commits; the table says so.
They change what earlier mapped commits add rather than adding to
them: the cold-boot test and portb harness of PR15's position 069, the
snapshot-request check of PR17's position 084, and the management
RPC's microVM test of PR25's position 128; and the receive path of
PR15's position 064's portb console, which PR20's positions 098 and 099
extend, and the console input of PR15's position 068. Replaying them on
upstream main, ca6b2b177, conflicts in all nine of their files, six of
which upstream main lacks, so they follow those PRs upstream. Say both
in the table's remarks.
Part of #549.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
0 commit comments