From 71847744cbb3ca68fa6ad5f47fc32fb8980e36b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" This requirement applies to situations in which images of text were intended to be
understood as text. Incidental text, such as in photographs that happen to include
a street sign, are not included. Nor is text that for some reason is designed to be
- invisible to all viewers. Stylized text, such as in corporate logos, should be treated
- in terms of its function on the page, which may or may not warrant including the content
- in the text alternative. Corporate visual guidelines beyond logo and logotype are
+ invisible to all viewers. Corporate visual guidelines beyond logo and logotype are
not included in the exception.
This requirement applies to situations in which images of text were intended to be
understood as text. Incidental text, such as in photographs that happen to include
a street sign, are not included. Nor is text that for some reason is designed to be
- invisible to all viewers. Stylized text, such as in corporate logos, should be treated
- in terms of its function on the page, which may or may not warrant including the content
- in the text alternative. Corporate identity or brand guidelines beyond logo and logotype are
+ invisible to all viewers. Corporate identity or brand guidelines beyond logo and logotype are
not included in the exception.
Intent of Contrast (Enhanced)
Intent of Contrast (Minimum)
Intent of Contrast (Enhanced)
Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-Text Contrast.
Text used as part of a logo or logotype is exempted from contrast requirements, under the assumption that logos/logotypes must comply with stricter color choices mandated - by corporate identity or brand guidelines. However, this can be problematic when + by corporate identity or brand guidelines.
+However, this can be problematic when logos or logotypes act as user interface components (such as a link or other interactive control). In these cases, as a best practice, authors should consider choosing a variant of the logo or logotype that has sufficient text contrast, if allowed by the corporate identity or brand guidelines. Alternatively, authors should consider providing an equivalent user interface component which serves the same purpose and meets contrast requirements.
-If logos are presented with an insufficient contrast, but their presentation was an author choice + rather than being mandated by corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast + presentation is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
+
+ Text used as part of a logo or logotype is exempted from contrast requirements, under the assumption that logos/logotypes must comply with stricter color choices mandated - by corporate identity or brand guidelines. However, this can be problematic when + by corporate identity or brand guidelines.
+However, this can be problematic when logos or logotypes act as user interface components (such as a link or other interactive control). In these cases, as a best practice, authors should consider choosing a variant of the logo or logotype that has sufficient text contrast, if allowed by the corporate identity or brand guidelines. Alternatively, authors should consider providing an equivalent user interface component which serves the same purpose and meets contrast requirements.
-If logos are presented with an insufficient contrast, but their presentation was an author choice + rather than being mandated by corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast + presentation is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
+
+ {pnp`MZR4G52581ZVY=OvpCe~Y
zbs5q_WGM{NO8=m}-_zg2@GgQB5Kccm4w5s^_U}sX9R}ka*biR~d!9=TUS#EaAQLGU
zTm5p7(Tc)j%Fi*|L||z+pVx=IV7Y2l?++8S@~P{l2zVO)Jz-t#KU#s|8CsSssFga`
zM`Z8)ax This requirement applies to situations in which images of text were intended to be
understood as text. Incidental text, such as in photographs that happen to include
a street sign, are not included. Nor is text that for some reason is designed to be
- invisible to all viewers. Corporate visual guidelines beyond logo and logotype are
- not included in the exception.
-
+ invisible to all viewers.
Beyond logos and logotypes, text that has insufficient contrast due to corporate identity or
+ brand guidelines is not exempted from the requirements of this criterion. In this provision there is an exception that reads "that are part of a picture that
contains significant other visual content,". This exception is intended to separate
pictures that have text in them from images of text that are done to replace text
- in order to get a particular look.
+ in order to get a particular look.
This requirement applies to situations in which images of text were intended to be
understood as text. Incidental text, such as in photographs that happen to include
a street sign, are not included. Nor is text that for some reason is designed to be
- invisible to all viewers. Corporate identity or brand guidelines beyond logo and logotype are
- not included in the exception.
+ invisible to all viewers.
Beyond logos and logotypes, text that has insufficient contrast due to corporate identity or
+ brand guidelines is not exempted from the requirements of this criterion. In this provision there is an exception that reads "that are part of a picture that
contains significant other visual content,". This exception is intended to separate
From 6e421e13ca3a20f804ffbe712e2242f96ca3e121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" This requirement applies to situations in which images of text were intended to be
understood as text. Incidental text, such as in photographs that happen to include
a street sign, are not included. Nor is text that for some reason is designed to be
- invisible to all viewers.
+ invisible or hard to discern to all viewers.
Beyond logos and logotypes, text that has insufficient contrast due to corporate identity or
diff --git a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html
index 3963310731..a385c86296 100644
--- a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html
+++ b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ This requirement applies to situations in which images of text were intended to be
understood as text. Incidental text, such as in photographs that happen to include
a street sign, are not included. Nor is text that for some reason is designed to be
- invisible to all viewers.
+ invisible or hard to discern to all viewers.
Beyond logos and logotypes, text that has insufficient contrast due to corporate identity or
From ebd9650c5aa3757e984783519d941a41753daa42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" Images of text do not scale as well as text because they tend to pixelate. It is also
harder to change foreground and background contrast and color combinations for images
of text, which is necessary for some users. See 1.4.5 Images of Text.
-
3#N{&9pjUuR?V!$nx!u-b6WR@
z525wBh%jiqnbWNu3wAfgwabm-nFHoxv3dbJXT@~ChQC2AZN^c@Q5I=DL8ddkx#TpASAPg9QVY+QOPxJ
z142jlq0rOfxUsF}k8O(?=J&&4%;WOu>4bM%x)9MEQiGoqJGGRw(C)N5(gZe3)Lr4&
zv_o!4(rWAs7a?dQX#_2R1TkAVZ{X(xiotL6+PB};SuQ2lg3#p=
`HH8JDlAEypMClxXu
zNd@+ft7O0gqewXe@ZUrSpVz72QoCS_{(8Mc(U;
Intent of Contrast (Enhanced)
Intent of Contrast (Minimum)
Intent of Contrast (Enhanced)
Intent of Contrast (Minimum)
Intent of Contrast (Enhanced)
Intent of Contrast (Enhanced)
Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-Text Contrast.
There are cases where text is heavily stylised – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
Text used as part of a logo or logotype is exempted from contrast requirements, diff --git a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html index a385c86296..d34268fa24 100644 --- a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html +++ b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@
There are cases where text is heavily stylised – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
See also 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced).
diff --git a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html index 5449c18fd6..1819730890 100644 --- a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html +++ b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html @@ -711,8 +711,8 @@When text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
– they fall under the definition of non-text content.
There are cases where text is heavily stylised – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes this success criterion.
If logos are presented with an insufficient contrast, but their presentation was an author choice - rather than being mandated by corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast +
If logos normally have sufficient contrast, but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, + rather than because of corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast presentation is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
diff --git a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html
index d34268fa24..0b8a13c74c 100644
--- a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html
+++ b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html
@@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ If logos are presented with an insufficient contrast, but their presentation was an author choice - rather than being mandated by corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast +
If logos normally have sufficient contrast, but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, + rather than because of corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast presentation is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
diff --git a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html
index 1819730890..dab893823b 100644
--- a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html
+++ b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html
@@ -663,9 +663,9 @@ If logos are presented with an insufficient contrast, but their presentation was an author choice rather than - being mandated by corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast presentation is - not "essential", and the logo is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
+If logos normally have sufficient contrast, but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, + rather than because of corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast + presentation is not "essential", and the logo is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
From 56d917651654e0fa51ec51faf01eebaa0057df8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" There are cases where text is heavily stylised – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
There are cases where text is heavily stylised – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
See also 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced). diff --git a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html index dab893823b..5efa0879b4 100644 --- a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html +++ b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@
There are cases where text is heavily stylised – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content.
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes this success criterion.
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes this success criterion.
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content and the requirements of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes this success criterion.
See also 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced). diff --git a/understanding/20/img/1.4.3-1.4.6-buttons-text-symbols.svg b/understanding/20/img/1.4.3-1.4.6-buttons-text-symbols.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..29a8c3ca24 --- /dev/null +++ b/understanding/20/img/1.4.3-1.4.6-buttons-text-symbols.svg @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ + diff --git a/understanding/20/img/1.4.3-1.4.6-stylized-text.svg b/understanding/20/img/1.4.3-1.4.6-stylized-text.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b82fea978e --- /dev/null +++ b/understanding/20/img/1.4.3-1.4.6-stylized-text.svg @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ + diff --git a/understanding/21/img/1.4.11-stylized-text.svg b/understanding/21/img/1.4.11-stylized-text.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b82fea978e --- /dev/null +++ b/understanding/21/img/1.4.11-stylized-text.svg @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ + diff --git a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html index 5efa0879b4..e2bb8b74e9 100644 --- a/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html +++ b/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html @@ -713,6 +713,10 @@
There are cases where text is heavily stylized – for instance, using a very ornate or distorted typeface – to the point where it acts more as a graphic, rather than text. Similarly, there are situations where text characters are used as symbols – used for their visual appearance, rather than expressing something in human language
. These cases fall under the definition of non-text content.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes this success criterion.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes this success criterion.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-Text Contrast.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes this success criterion.
X, often used for "Close" buttons, and a
>character, to act as a right-pointing arrow — they count as non-text characters/symbols. Their contrast ratio of just above 3:1 passes Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-Text Contrast.
- If logos normally have sufficient contrast, but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, +
If logos normally have sufficient contrast but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, rather than because of corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast presentation is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
If logos normally have sufficient contrast, but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, +
If logos normally have sufficient contrast but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, rather than because of corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast presentation is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
If logos normally have sufficient contrast, but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, +
If logos normally have sufficient contrast but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, rather than because of corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast presentation is not "essential", and the logo is not exempt from the contrast requirements.
From 3b88162a480f22d6a2c072778bec0bf064f69659 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Patrick H. Lauke"However, this can be problematic when logos or logotypes act as user interface components (such as a link or - other interactive control). In these cases, as a best practice, authors should consider + other interactive control). In these cases, as a recommended practice, authors should consider choosing a variant of the logo or logotype that has sufficient text contrast, if allowed by the corporate identity or brand guidelines. Alternatively, authors should consider providing an equivalent user interface component which serves the same purpose and meets diff --git a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html index 96d9239286..153e43c025 100644 --- a/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html +++ b/understanding/20/contrast-minimum.html @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
However, this can be problematic when logos or logotypes act as user interface components (such as a link or - other interactive control). In these cases, as a best practice, authors should consider + other interactive control). In these cases, as a recommended practice, authors should consider choosing a variant of the logo or logotype that has sufficient text contrast, if allowed by the corporate identity or brand guidelines. Alternatively, authors should consider providing an equivalent user interface component which serves the same purpose and meets