-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
[FIX]: Guard against empty output file path in ServerComparer #14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
x15sr71
wants to merge
1
commit into
CCExtractor:master
Choose a base branch
from
x15sr71:fix/server-comparer-empty-path-guard
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+12
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you return without posting a status, how is the platform supposed to know something went wrong?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
finishPOST (exit code + runtime) goes through the same as before this PR,SendExitCodeAndRuntimeruns after the comparison loop, outside the try/catch, so neither the old swallowed exception nor the new early return affects it. TheTestResultrow is created either way; only theequality/uploadPOST is skipped, so noTestResultFilerow is written for that output.The platform reads that absence as a failure. In
get_test_results()(mod_test/controllers.py), when a regression test has noTestResultFilerows it checksRegressionTestOutputdirectly and setstest_error = Trueif a non-ignored output was expected (theelsebranch). That runs on every status surface that calls it, PR status (viacomment_pr), PR comment, badge, detail page, except commit-test status, which still uses the old count-based query inprogress_type_requestwhere zero rows reads as zero failures → SUCCESS. That's the actual bug; #1119 fixes it by moving that path ontoget_test_results().So this PR is the narrower part: it stops the silent
ArgumentExceptionand makes the missing-output path explicit, it doesn't change what's sent to the platform, sincefinishalready fired and the comparison row was already absent before this change. One flag, the guard returns silently, so unlike the old swallowed exception (which hitprocessor.Logger.Error) there's no tester-side trace now.ServerComparerhas no logger field; happy to add aConsole.Error.WriteLinein the guard, or wire anILoggerintoServerComparerlikeTesterandProcessoralready use - whichever you prefer.