Skip to content

merge queue: checking #367 on main (0961e98), stacked on #369 - #372

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/1bb35a8f3d
Closed

mergify[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/1bb35a8f3d

Conversation

@mergify

@mergify mergify Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

This is a merge queue draft opened by Mergify. Nobody needs to act on it.
Mergify opened it for batch glamorous-bleuette-l109gm of the dependabot queue, to test #367 before it merges into main.

What this draft tests

Mergify checks that #367 still passes CI once combined with everything queued ahead of it. CI runs on this draft's code, built in this order:

  1. main at 0961e98
  2. the pull request queued ahead of this batch, listed below, which brings the tip to 3d42f43
  3. #367, the pull request of this batch

The check is speculative: it assumes the pull requests ahead will merge, so it starts without waiting for them.

✨ Where it stands: closed

The pull request #367 has been manually updated.

Follow the dependabot queue in the dashboard

What happens next

  • Mergify closes this draft.

Tip

A red check is not necessarily caused by this batch. These checks run on a tip that also carries the commits of the pull request ahead, so a failure here can come from it as much as from #367. See only this batch's changes.

Queued ahead of this batch

This pull request entered the queue before this batch and is not part of it.

Metadata for CI tooling, read by mergify ci
---
all_scopes: false
checking_base_sha: 3d42f43823bbff084dfd09961eb32a168e7e0fc4
previous_check_retries: []
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 367
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...
Required conditions of queue rule dependabot for merge
Required conditions to stay in the queue

dependabot Bot and others added 4 commits October 15, 2026 06:53
Bumps [github/codeql-action/analyze](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.38.2 to 4.38.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@2892aa5...24c5418)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action/analyze
  dependency-version: 4.38.3
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Bumps [github/codeql-action/autobuild](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.38.2 to 4.38.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@2892aa5...24c5418)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action/autobuild
  dependency-version: 4.38.3
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: EvilBit-Labs/Stringy/.coderabbit.yml
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 39a79cfb-9a45-45a4-bd3a-a8a8febe671d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mergify mergify Bot closed this Oct 15, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/1bb35a8f3d branch October 15, 2026 08:14
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants