Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2018. It is now read-only.

layers: Check that indirect buffers have the correct usage flag#2334

Open
chrisforbes wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
indirect-buffer-usage
Open

layers: Check that indirect buffers have the correct usage flag#2334
chrisforbes wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
indirect-buffer-usage

Conversation

@chrisforbes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes #2333

@chrisforbes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Formatting issues fixed.

@daveh-lunarg daveh-lunarg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new VU checks look good. Do we need a test to exercise them?

@tobine tobine left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Needs tests.

@jzulauf-lunarg jzulauf-lunarg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Look good so far. Assuming you're pushing layer_validation_tests.cpp updates, yes?

@chrisforbes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Yes, I will add some tests to go with this.

@chrisforbes chrisforbes force-pushed the indirect-buffer-usage branch from 0e13e2e to ee33d96 Compare April 6, 2018 22:18
@mark-lunarg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@chrisforbes, this repository will close for write access on Sunday, 5/13/2018. If it is pushed before that time it will be present in the follow-on Vulkan-ValidationLayers repository on Monday, otherwise a new PR will be required in the new repo. (I think it's acceptable to push the changes if they're OK and to add the tests next week).

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants