-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
Port SPARK-48949 scan-side partition filter to GpuBatchScanExec [fast-ut][databricks][reduced-it] #15842
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
amahussein
wants to merge
5
commits into
NVIDIA:main
Choose a base branch
from
amahussein:rapids-11453
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+103
−2
Open
Port SPARK-48949 scan-side partition filter to GpuBatchScanExec [fast-ut][databricks][reduced-it] #15842
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9ce6ceb
Port SPARK-48949 scan-side partition filter to GpuBatchScanExec
amahussein 03a16fe
Merge branch 'main' into rapids-11453
amahussein 07a18f4
Cover the replicate branch in the SPJ partition filter test
amahussein b55c0fa
Merge branch 'main' into rapids-11453
firestarman f404029
Merge branch 'main' into rapids-11453
amahussein File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT:
The extra key that partition filtering should prune (
id=3) only exists on the left table, and the comments above say the twoid=1files are what make the left scan partially clustered.GpuBatchScanExecapplies the SPARK-48949 filter to both scans, then branches onreplicatePartitions(pad vs replicate). A regression that applied the filter only in the pad (!replicatePartitions) branch would still pass this matrix, because the replicated right scan never enumerates a group that is absent fromcommonPartitionValues.Could we add a right-only partition key (e.g.
id=4on the right table only) in the filtered + partially clustered cell, or parametrize which side holds the extra key? That would force the replicated scan through the samecommonPartValuesMapfilter beforeSeq.fill(numSplits.get)(splits). Inner-join output would be unchanged —id=4would not appear in the result.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, real gap. With the old fixture the right scan is the replicate side and its keys
{1, 2}are exactly the intersection, so it never had a group to drop.Verified it bites: I built with the filter skipped when
replicatePartitions=true. The old fixture passed, the new one fails onpartially_clustered-filteredwith the expectedAssertionError.One wrinkle with adding only
id=4: it swaps the pad and replicate roles, and the new pad side has one file per key, so everynumSplitsis 1 and the counts collapse to 4/2 for bothpartially_clusteredandclustered. That quietly disables the assertion covering partial clustering.Made it symmetric instead: a key each side lacks (
id=3left,id=4right), plus a two-file key inside the intersection on each side. Both branches are then covered whichever side Spark picks, counts are 3/5/2/4, and all four cells pass.