docs: name the subject in two README sentences - #92
Merged
Conversation
Two sentences introduced in 86a986e depart from the register the rest of the file follows. "The distinction matters:" names nothing. The sentence it introduces already states the condition, so the lead-in is removed and the sentence begins with the mechanism. The second sentence replaced a quantified claim with an unquantified one. "Other EU AI Act policies also depend on declared facts" is weaker than the figure the file already reports two hundred lines earlier, and drops the proportion a reader needs in order to judge how much of the Act is automatable. It now states that 170 of the 185 input-field reads across the 29 policies are declarations, consistent with the split given under "The problem". The hedge "natural starting points" becomes "the starting points". No figure, link or heading target changes. opa check, regal lint, check-anchors.sh, check-version-refs.sh and model-card-coverage.sh --check all pass.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this changes
Two sentences in
README.md, both introduced in 86a986e (#91). Documentationonly; no
.regofile is touched.Type
v2/directory)Detail
README.mdL66. "The distinction matters:" names nothing, and the sentenceit introduces already states the condition. The lead-in is removed so the
sentence begins with the mechanism.
README.mdL227. #91 replaced a quantified claim with an unquantified one."Other EU AI Act policies also depend on declared facts" is weaker than the
figure the file already reports under "The problem", and it drops the proportion
a reader needs in order to judge how much of the Act is automatable at all. It
now reads: 170 of the 185 input-field reads across the 29 policies are
declarations. The hedge "natural starting points" becomes "the starting points".
Checklist
.regohas a sibling*_test.rego— n/a, no.regochangedREADME.mdlists the new policy — n/a, no new policyopa check --ignore custom/ .passes locallyregal lint --ignore-files custom/ .passes locallyv2/directory requiredAlso run locally, all passing:
check-anchors.sh,check-version-refs.sh,model-card-coverage.sh --check.Source(s)
No regulation is encoded or reinterpreted by this PR.
Notes for reviewers
The restored figure is consistent with the "The problem" section rather than a
new claim, and
find international/eu_ai_act -name '*.rego' ! -name '*_test.rego'still returns 29. Both sentences are prose only; no figure, link or heading
target changes.