Skip to content

About

[ACL 2026 main] Long-Context Hallucination Detection Benchmark: Rethinking Evaluation for LLM Hallucination Detection: A Desiderata, A New RAG-based Benchmark, New Insights

Resources

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

4 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Repository files navigation

TRIVIA+ Dataset

ACL Anthology Amazon Science arXiv

A rigorous benchmark for hallucination detection — built against the gaps in every existing one.

  • 94K-char contexts (7–33x longer than prior benchmarks)
  • Human-verified, sentence-level labels
  • Controlled label noise for robustness testing
  • Satisfies all 7 desiderata for evaluation

Dataset Overview

Split Count
Train 2,263
Valid 316
Test 645
Total 3,224

Data Sources

The dataset aggregates examples from multiple QA benchmarks:

Source Count Description
drop 1,339 (41.5%) Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs
msmarco / ms_marco 763 (23.7%) Microsoft Machine Reading Comprehension
nq 674 (20.9%) Natural Questions
trivia 309 (9.6%) Trivia Question Answering
covid 139 (4.3%) COVID-19 scientific literature QA

Note: The source column contains both msmarco (521) and ms_marco (242) as variants for the same origin dataset.

LLM Response Sources

Responses were generated by three LLMs:

Model Count Description
mixtral_8x7b 1,686 (52.3%) Mixtral 8x7B
claude 1,006 (31.2%) Claude (SOTA LLM)
gemma 532 (16.5%) Gemma 7B

Human Annotation

Each sample was annotated at the sentence level by multiple annotators (up to 6 per sample) through a rigorous multi-stage pipeline:

  1. Two annotators label each sample independently
  2. On disagreement, two additional annotators provide labels
  3. If still no clear majority, two more labels are gathered
  4. Labels are aggregated via majority vote with strictest-label tiebreaking

Annotators were trained over two rounds with author audits. Low-performing annotators were removed using the Dawid-Skene model. Each sentence receives one of four labels: Supported, Contradicted, Not Mentioned, or Supplementary.

TRIVIA+ Multi-Vote Annotation Pipeline
Multi-vote annotation pipeline with escalating review stages and Dawid-Skene quality filtering.

File

triviaplus_dataset.parquet — Cleaned dataset with all annotations.

See DATA_DETAILS.md for complete column descriptions, label aggregation logic, and label distributions.

Loading the Dataset

import pandas as pd

# Load the dataset
df = pd.read_parquet("triviaplus_dataset.parquet")

# Filter by split
train = df[df['split'] == 'train']
valid = df[df['split'] == 'valid']
test = df[df['split'] == 'test']

# Access sentence-level labels
for idx, row in df.head(3).iterrows():
    print(f"Question: {row['question'][:50]}...")
    print(f"Answer: {row['answer'][:50]}...")
    print(f"Sentences: {row['answer_sentence_list']}")
    print(f"Labels: {row['sentence_level_majority_vote']}")
    print(f"Response label: {row['response_level_label_binary']}")
    print()

Verification

Run the label consistency check:

python verify_label_consistency.py triviaplus_dataset.parquet

Citation

If you use this dataset, please cite our paper:

@inproceedings{chen-etal-2026-rethinking-evaluation,
    title = "Rethinking Evaluation for {LLM} Hallucination Detection: A Desiderata, A New {RAG}-based Benchmark, New Insights",
    author = "Chen, Wenbo  and
      Padmanabhan, Veena  and
      Giyahchi, Tootiya  and
      Wong, Elaine  and
      Akoglu, Leman",
    editor = "Liakata, Maria  and
      Moreira, Viviane P.  and
      Zhang, Jiajun  and
      Jurgens, David",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-long.680/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.680",
    pages = "14912--14931",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-390-6"
}

License

This dataset is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

See the LICENSE file for the full license text.

About

[ACL 2026 main] Long-Context Hallucination Detection Benchmark: Rethinking Evaluation for LLM Hallucination Detection: A Desiderata, A New RAG-based Benchmark, New Insights

Resources

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

4 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Used by

Contributors

Languages