Repository navigation
feat(prx): declare evidenced PS5 pending exports - #7749
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution! Authors with no pull requests merged into |
|
Thanks, the export code looks good. One change in the docs, please:
Once that's pushed, we'll run CI on the new head and merge. |
25e44c9 to
91c9318
Compare
|
Updated in |
|
Thanks @xdCloudy. The |
|
@xdCloudy Following up on the inventory PRs — the ~200 skeleton libraries are a great foundation. I've opened #7835 and #7840 declaring exports for 13 of them ( One limitation I want to flag honestly: that DB is a flat name list, so per-module attribution is prefix-derived ( If those tables can be shared — even just name lists per library, without binaries — I'd be glad to align the remaining skeletons to the evidenced exports instead of prefix guesses, and correct anything already merged if a name landed in the wrong module. If they can't be shared, no problem — I'll keep it to unambiguous-prefix declarations only. |
What
Adds 108 pending export declarations, all calling
NotImplemented_nid_no_patch. 87 have credible prototype evidence. 46 intentionally use the existing no-parameter unknown-signature convention; those declarations are for import resolution only and make no ABI claim. Technical-debt files document the unknown cases. Duplicate invitation-dialog exports were removed after rebasing.Evidence includes SharpProspero, shadPS4, PS5-3.20_Libs, and ps5rs.
Tested
pr_overlapChecklist
main; all six branches were rebased on current upstreammain.NotImplemented_nid_no_patch; inventory-only dummy entries do not add callable stubs.