Fix needed for change in root io protocol root-project/root#22744#51432
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
d85daea to
06d2904
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51432/50102 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar for master. It involves the following packages:
@Dr15Jones, @cmsbuild, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@jblomer , can you please confirm if this is the correct fix to make sure CMSSW uses its plugin for access |
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Looks good to me. Apologies for the trouble! |
|
In my current change, I think there is no need to explicitly remove the handler . Adding a handler with same regex override it, I am testing it locally and will update the PR |
06d2904 to
47227b7
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51432/50108 |
|
Pull request #51432 was updated. @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please check and sign again. |
b3b2220 to
1c8dfff
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51432/50114 |
|
please test |
|
Pull request #51432 was updated. @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please check and sign again. |
|
+1 assuming the tests will pass |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@cms-sw/orp-l2 , feel free to merge it for next IB |
|
+1 |
This change is needed to make sure cmssw still uses its TFileAdaptor ( see cms-sw/cmsdist#10706 (comment) failure after root-project/root#22744 change in ROOT master and ROOT 6.40). Root's now register
TNetXNGFilefor^[x]?root[s]?:protocol which override cmssw'sTStorageFactoryFileto hanle^root:or^[x]?root:. This PR proposes that before adding CMSSW handlers we make sure to delete any handlers register by ROOT itself.FYI @Dr15Jones