Skip to content

[2026-06 CWG Motion 13] P2243R0 Language linkage for templates #9134

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
notdanhan wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+1 −2
Open

[2026-06 CWG Motion 13] P2243R0 Language linkage for templates #9134

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
11f3257
P2243R0: Language linkage for templates
notdanhan Jun 14, 2026
858a0a8
fixup: removed newline
notdanhan Jun 15, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions source/templates.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@
\item be an \grammarterm{alias-declaration}.
\end{itemize}

It shall not be a \grammarterm{linkage-specification}.
Comment thread
notdanhan marked this conversation as resolved.

\pnum
A \grammarterm{template-declaration} is a \grammarterm{declaration}.
A declaration introduced by a template declaration of a
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -152,8 +154,6 @@
\indextext{template name!linkage of}%
A specialization (explicit or implicit) of one template is
distinct from all specializations of any other template.
A template, an explicit specialization\iref{temp.expl.spec}, and a
partial specialization shall not have C language linkage.
\begin{note}
Default arguments for function templates and for member functions of
class templates are considered definitions for the purpose of template
Expand Down
Loading