Skip to content

CP-13727 Merge DLPXDOC-6073 to master: Document Concurrent gRPC Thread Behavior Based on CPU Count - #706

Merged
vimleshmishra merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
develop
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

CP-13727 Merge DLPXDOC-6073 to master: Document Concurrent gRPC Thread Behavior Based on CPU Count#706
vimleshmishra merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
develop

Conversation

@vimleshmishra

@vimleshmishra vimleshmishra commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Promotes a single develop commit to master: DLPXDOC-6073 "Document Concurrent gRPC Thread Behavior Based on CPU Count" (#698).

Problem / Solution

Adds a new Best Practices page, Concurrent_Plugin_Operations.md, documenting the Delphix Engine's concurrency limit for plugin operations: min(32, <Engine CPUs> + 4), the impact (queued operations can look like a hung plugin call), and sizing/scheduling recommendations.

Context: root cause analysis from ESCL-5693, tracked as a docs task in DLPXDOC-6073.

Testing Done

No new changes beyond what was already reviewed and merged in #698 — this is a straight promotion of that commit to master.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@vimleshmishra
vimleshmishra requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2026 05:03
@vimleshmishra vimleshmishra changed the title DLPXDOC-6073 Document Concurrent gRPC Thread Behavior Based on CPU Co… DLPXDOC-6073 Document Concurrent gRPC Thread Behavior Based on CPU Count Sep 8, 2026
@vimleshmishra vimleshmishra changed the title DLPXDOC-6073 Document Concurrent gRPC Thread Behavior Based on CPU Count CP-13727 Merge DLPXDOC-6073 to master: Document Concurrent gRPC Thread Behavior Based on CPU Count Sep 8, 2026

@SumoSourabh SumoSourabh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. You would need to a merge commit instead of squash commit.

@vimleshmishra
vimleshmishra merged commit bb2bff0 into master Sep 8, 2026
10 checks passed
@vimleshmishra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Looks good. You would need to a merge commit instead of squash commit.

done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants