docs: fix ContentType union syntax

[deepanshupal]

Removes the extra union separator after type ContentType = in the lifecycle guide. The next line already starts with |, so TypeScript currently fails to parse the example.

Validation: the original alias fails parsing; the corrected alias parses and keeps all nine documented union values unchanged. The full documentation build and repository suite were not run.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Adjusted the formatting of a content type declaration; the listed options remain unchanged.

[coderabbitai]

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 99fdb3b2-63bf-43c3-a0ad-9e18793c45c5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f685737 and 3df964c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/essential/life-cycle.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

The ContentType declaration in the lifecycle documentation no longer has a union pipe on its declaration line. Its existing alternatives remain unchanged.

Changes

ContentType Declaration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Format the union declaration docs/essential/life-cycle.md	The declaration starts without a union pipe. The existing content-type alternatives remain listed below it.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 3df96

This documentation-only correction preserves the nine documented values; no concrete merge blocker remains.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to 3df96

The change affects 1 system.

Changed systems: docs

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Systems and components

• observed — docs (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.

Before / after behavior

• observed — Modified behavior in docs/essential/life-cycle.md: ContentType no longer has a union pipe on its declaration line; its existing alternatives remain listed below.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the fix to the ContentType union syntax.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create a new PR

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{One pipe stepped aside~ ♡
The options stay in their line
A tidy type now waits
No choices lost along the way
Nice and neat, you noticed~ (￣ω￣)}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}