Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (28 loc) · 4.74 KB

python-compose-5-plus.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (28 loc) · 4.74 KB

Is Flisk right for your team?

← Back to the README

Your answers: Python · Docker Compose · 5 or more parts. Click a tab to change one; the score updates.

1. What is the app written in?
JavaScript / TypeScriptPython (selected)GoJava / KotlinRuby / PHPOther / not sure
2. How do developers start the app on their laptop today?
KubernetesScripts + a wikiDocker Compose (selected)Tilt or SkaffoldA Docker appDev ContainersIn the browserJust run the codeOther / not sure
3. How many parts does the app have? (website, API, background jobs, …)
Just one2–4 parts5 or more (selected)

80% fit score: Great fit

Great fit. Flisk was made for teams like yours.

  • ✅ Flisk can create Python parts for you (flisk resource … --language python), and there is a ready example.
  • ✅ Your team already uses containers. Flisk writes those setup files for them and keeps them in sync.
  • ✅ New developers start with two commands (flisk doctor, flisk up) instead of a long setup guide. Not yet timed with real new hires.
  • ✅ Every laptop gets the same base setup, so "it works on my machine" happens less.
  • ✅ 5 or more parts is what Flisk is for. Our tests start 100 small test parts at once (test stubs, not a real app).
  • ✅ The score assumes a team of 10 developers. It is simple math on your answers, not measured savings.

How the score adds up

Your answer Points
Language Python 18 / 20
How you start it today Docker Compose 16 / 20
Pains (we assumed) Slow onboarding, laptops that differ 12 / 24
Parts 5 or more parts 20 / 20
Team size (we assumed) 10 developers 14 / 16
Score 80%

Same math as flisk.sh/fit. Two things have no tabs here, so we assumed them (marked "we assumed"); change them on the website. The score never says "great fit" when a reason above says otherwise.

Next: install Flisk and pick how to start.