Repository navigation
test(config): qualify native process policy execution - #186
Merged
Merged
Conversation
added 28 commits
October 7, 2026 19:44
…ive-process-policy-acceptance
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Native workloads can author init, shutdown signals/grace and restart policies. This adds a required Docker scenario that observes SIGUSR1 delivery, delayed graceful exit, forced termination after authored grace, orphan adoption/reaping by init, and exactly two on-failure retries before a successful third start. A separate attempt-result marker, exact engine restart state and owned start/die history must all agree; bounded synthetic proof is retained privately before verification and teardown.
The fixture uses a cached immutable Bun image and one owned persistent evidence volume, publishes no ports and changes no DNS or trust. A second native profile checks retained records and an EROFS write refusal on its read-only mount. A supported baseline must validate first. Active and inactive unsupported resource/logging declarations require precise compiler diagnostics through config validate, followed by the execution command’s fixed redacted refusal before hooks or engine requests. Teardown checks exact ownership and preserves both private roots and recovery identities if cleanup is incomplete.
Verification
At 1c7b74c:
Release Signal
Semantic Surfaces
Product execution semantics are unchanged. The new registered scenario, evidence controls and harness documentation cover the existing process-policy surface.
Risks / Follow-up
This fixture does not qualify resource limits/reservations, logging policy, multi-network, file-secret or advanced-build execution. Hosted exact-head CI remains required; M3 live acceptance is complete.