Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2026-07-13

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change	Pending
rust	patch	2026-07-06 → 2026-07-13	2026-07-27 (+1)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 11am"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 28, 2026 3:06pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 28, 2026 3:06pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Jul 28, 2026 3:06pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
A full-workspace nightly bump can surface new rustc/clippy failures beyond the small fixes included; the duplicate customManagers key in renovate.json may drop earlier custom managers unless merged intentionally.

Overview
Bumps the repo Rust toolchain from nightly-2026-07-06 to nightly-2026-07-13 in rust-toolchain.toml, .config/mise/mise.lock, and the error-stack Rust version badges/docs.

Adds a Renovate regex custom manager so the rust pin in the mise lockfile can track rust-toolchain.toml (mise does not update that entry on its own).

Compiler-driven follow-ups: drops the obsolete string_from_utf8_lossy_owned nightly feature from HashQL crates; adjusts ChunkedBitSet union/subtract/intersect loops to match on &mut *self_chunk instead of a redundant mut binding; and implements new Step::forward_overflowing / backward_overflowing on generated ID types in the HashQL id macros.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b802e88. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.36%. Comparing base (4f2d2ce) to head (ab3b05d).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/@local/hashql/core/src/id/bit_vec/mod.rs	33.33%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9114   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.36%   59.36%           
=======================================
  Files        1406     1406           
  Lines      136519   136519           
  Branches     6407     6407           
=======================================
+ Hits        81043    81044    +1     
+ Misses      54486    54485    -1     
  Partials      990      990           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	12.10% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.55% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	5.75% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.23% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <100.00%> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	7.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	27.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	38.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.98% <33.33%> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.66%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 3 (👁 1) regressed benchmarks
✅ 95 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%
👁	pattern_match_constant	150.8 ns	180 ns	-16.2%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/rust-toolchains (ab3b05d) with main (4f2d2ce)}

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b802e88. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$23.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.281 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.820 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$33.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.528 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 780 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$49.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$90.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 580 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 812 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$270 \mathrm{ms} \pm 834 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.841 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.878 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.596 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.556 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.596 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 545 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$61.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 456 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 394 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$80.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 453 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 434 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$73.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 614 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$49.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 631 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 480 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$17.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$532 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph