Fix flush for initial writes - #158
Open
mark0-cn wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
has_pending_operationsreport those initial writesflushpublish initial writes as documentedextendas a non-pending operationRoot cause
Before the first publish, operations are applied directly to the write-side copy as an initialization optimization and never enter the oplog.
has_pending_operationsonly inspected the oplog boundary, so it returnedfalseafter an initial write.flushconsequently skipped the publish and readers continued to see the old value.The new
first_pendingbit records whether that direct-write path consumed any operations and is cleared by the first successful swap.Validation
cargo test --offlinecargo fmt --all -- --checkextendandappend -> flush -> read