-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
feat: gamma anticommutator and slash of Lorentz vector #1206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
wdconinc
wants to merge
9
commits into
leanprover-community:master
Choose a base branch
from
wdconinc:patch-2
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+120
−18
Open
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d8e31f9
feat: gamma anticommutator and slash of Lorentz vector
wdconinc 63fb106
fix: def γ : Fin 1 ⊕ Fin 3; imports
wdconinc 35cbc8d
fix: def slash (k : Lorentz.Vector)
wdconinc 4c89feb
fix: gamma_anticomm proof by γ0_mul_γ0 etc reuse
wdconinc f3ea91e
feat: Dirac slash as an ℝ-linear map
wdconinc 9eb1774
feat: slash notation
wdconinc 88e9ac2
fix: docstring for notation
wdconinc e022b0f
fix: use notation for linear map
wdconinc ef272b9
fix: mv toComplexVector to Lorentz.Vector
wdconinc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may be difficult, but I think it might be possible to lift this to an intertwining map between representations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is your thinking here that this will then have an easier way to reuse the same structures for various spinor representations (Dirac and Weyl) without having this built up on the foundation of only a single gamma matrix definition? I think that would likely require some more work on generalizing the gamma matrix definition because the current form only works for Dirac spinors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This wasn't my thinking, but this may be a benefit here. I was just thinking that
slashreally does represent a map between representations, and it might be nice to encode that somewhere. But this can wait till a future date. I think generalizing the gamma matrices would also be nice (making explicit that they carry e.g.complexLorentzTensorindices or similar).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I think one of the things we would need to do before any of this is define and make a good API around
Fermion.dirac, which we currently do not have.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As it stands, I'm happy to approve this PR now for merger.