Fix elements exceeding node size for unrolled lists - #19
Merged
Merged
Conversation
mattwparas
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2026
mattwparas
left a comment
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch, thank you! I'll publish a new release tonight
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On coalesce, the left and right nodes' locations and pointers are swapped, but not size, meaning that a node could have 6 elements but have size 4.
If you append this resulting node to an empty list, they don't coalesce and an empty node would remain as the head, while still linking to the other node, causing what you see below:
Before
After
After adding the size swap + test
Notes
Also, seems like
asserts_invariants()didn't callassert!, when I added it, more errors appeared. All seem fixed after my change.