Skip to content

fix(factor_coder): prevent per-instrument ML training hang in factor code#1410

Open
genisis0x wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
genisis0x:fix/1407-factor-per-instrument-training-guard
Open

fix(factor_coder): prevent per-instrument ML training hang in factor code#1410
genisis0x wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
genisis0x:fix/1407-factor-per-instrument-training-guard

Conversation

@genisis0x
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@genisis0x genisis0x commented May 12, 2026

Summary

  • Fixes ML-based factors (LSTM/RandomForest) hang on large datasets (5M+ rows) #1407. ML-based factors (LSTM, RandomForest, XGBoost, ...) hang for hours at 100% CPU on realistic A-share panels (~5K instruments x ~1K trading days). Root cause is an LLM-generated anti-pattern where model construction and training are wrapped inside a nested loop over instruments and dates, producing O(N * T) training iterations. Critic feedback already rejects the pattern in retrospect, but every iteration pays the full multi-hour execution cost before the rejection lands.

Two-layer guard

1. Static evaluator guardrail. detect_per_instrument_training_antipattern walks the AST of the generated factor code and matches:

  • an outer for whose target or iterable identifier contains an instrument-like hint (instrument, stock, ticker, symbol, code),
  • a nested for whose body contains an ML estimator constructor or training call (.fit, .partial_fit, .train, train_*(, LSTM/GRU/RNN/Transformer/RandomForest/XGB/LGBM/CatBoost/GradientBoosting/SVR/SVC/MLP/Sequential).

When matched, FactorEvaluatorForCoder.evaluate short-circuits with critic-style feedback so CoSTEER repair runs against the guidance instead of paying for a hung implementation.execute() call.

2. Prompt hardening. qlib_factor_strategy gains an explicit rule against per-instrument or per-day model retraining, with reference patterns:

  • single panel fit + batch predict, or
  • groupby(level='instrument').rolling(...).apply(...) vectorized form.

This pushes the LLM toward correct ML factor code on first generation.

Validation

  • uv run pytest test/utils/coder/test_factor_antipattern.py — 8 passed
    • LSTM/RandomForest/XGBoost nested-loop variants are flagged.
    • Panel-level single-fit pattern is allowed.
    • groupby / rolling / apply pipelines are allowed.
    • Nested non-training loops, empty code, and syntax-broken code do not raise and return None.
  • uv run black --check rdagent/components/coder/factor_coder/evaluators.py test/utils/coder/test_factor_antipattern.py -l 120 — clean.

Notes

  • The detector is conservative: it requires both the instrument-like loop hint AND a recognised ML training call inside the inner loop body. Non-ML factor loops (rolling stats, groupby reductions, descriptive aggregations) are not flagged.
  • prompts.yaml is YAML; black/ruff do not format it, so only Python files are part of the lint surface.

Fixes #1407


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://RDAgent--1410.org.readthedocs.build/en/1410/

…code

When the factor coder generates ML-based factors (LSTM, RandomForest,
XGBoost, etc.) the LLM occasionally wraps model construction and
.fit() inside a nested loop over instruments and trading days. On a
realistic A-share panel (~5K instruments x ~1K days x N epochs) that
produces O(N * T) training iterations and the run hangs at 100% CPU
for hours instead of completing in minutes. Critic feedback already
rejects the pattern in retrospect, but the LLM keeps regenerating
similar code and each iteration pays the full execution cost.

This change introduces a two-layer guard for the anti-pattern:

1) Static evaluator guardrail
   detect_per_instrument_training_antipattern walks the AST of the
   generated factor code and looks for a ``for`` loop whose target or
   iterable identifier contains an instrument-like hint
   (instrument, stock, ticker, symbol, code) AND that contains a
   nested ``for`` whose body matches an ML estimator constructor or
   training call (``.fit``, ``.partial_fit``, ``.train``,
   ``train_*(...)`` , LSTM/GRU/RNN/Transformer/RandomForest/XGB/LGBM/
   CatBoost/GradientBoosting/SVR/SVC/MLP/Sequential). When a match
   is found, FactorEvaluatorForCoder short-circuits with
   critic-style feedback so CoSTEER can repair without paying for
   a multi-hour execute() call.

2) Prompt hardening
   qlib_factor_strategy gains an explicit rule against per-instrument
   or per-day model retraining, with a reference panel-fit + batch-
   predict pattern and a groupby/rolling vectorized alternative. This
   pushes the LLM toward correct ML factor code on first generation.

Test cases cover positive detection for LSTM, RandomForest and
XGBoost variants and negative detection for the recommended
panel-fit pattern, groupby/rolling pipelines, nested non-training
loops, empty input, and syntax-broken code.

Fixes microsoft#1407
@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@genisis0x please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]

Options:

  • (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
  • (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"
Contributor License Agreement

Contribution License Agreement

This Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
and conveys certain license rights to Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (“Microsoft”) for Your
contributions to Microsoft open source projects. This Agreement is effective as of the latest signature
date below.

  1. Definitions.
    “Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form,
    that is delivered by You to Microsoft under this Agreement.
    “Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by Microsoft and offered under a license
    approved by the Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org).
    “Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any
    Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control
    systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of
    discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or
    otherwise designated in writing by You as “Not a Submission.”
    “Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any
    associated comments and documentation.
  2. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any
    Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as
    described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.
  3. Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work.
    Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately
    to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You
    received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase “Submission
    containing materials of a third party:” followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other
    restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project’s written
    guidelines concerning Submissions.
  4. Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else
    for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your
    Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual
    property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your
    employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term “You” in this
    Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and
    desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement
    and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.
  5. Licenses.
  • Copyright License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the
    Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute
    the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third
    parties.
  • Patent License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under
    Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the
    Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and
    import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.
  • Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
    No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are
    granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.
  1. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above
    licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may
    have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to
    make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your
    employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable
    law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You
    have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement.
    You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS
    REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES
    EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
    PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF
    NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  2. Notice to Microsoft. You agree to notify Microsoft in writing of any facts or circumstances of which
    You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any
    respect.
  3. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about
    contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other
    information that You submit with Your Submission.
  4. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and
    the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County,
    Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to
    exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all
    defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.
  5. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and
    supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between
    the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Microsoft.

@genisis0x
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

CLA reviewed and good to go.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@genisis0x
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @XianBW — also ~7 days open. factor_coder per-instrument ML training was hanging when a single instrument fails partway — patch propagates the failure so the loop unblocks instead of waiting indefinitely. Would you have a moment? Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ML-based factors (LSTM/RandomForest) hang on large datasets (5M+ rows)

1 participant