You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PR #20308 adds aggregate dotnet test exit-code normalization as a temporary workaround for dotnet/sdk#56214. Aspire is pinned to .NET SDK 11.0.100-rc.1.26425.128, which predates the upstream fix.
Remove the workaround after Aspire upgrades to a .NET 11 SDK build verified to contain dotnet/sdk#56296 or the equivalent fix from dotnet/sdk#56219.
Scope
Remove the aggregate exit-code normalization from the shared and Deployment E2E dotnet test paths.
Remove normalization helpers and workflow plumbing that are no longer needed.
Update docs/ci/mtp-args-pipeline.md to describe the fixed SDK behavior.
Update or remove the focused normalization tests and test-trigger mappings with the implementation.
Validation
Before removing the workaround, verify that an all-skipped MTP run with --ignore-exit-code 8 returns success through dotnet test on the upgraded SDK, including the shared Bash and PowerShell test lanes and the Deployment E2E skip path.
Activity
MihuBot commentedon Sep 28, 2026
I'm a bot. Here is a possible related and/or duplicate issue (I may be wrong):
joperezr commentedon Sep 28, 2026
🤖 Aspire triage pass — 2026-09-28 21:58 UTC
Area:
area-acquisitionKind: feature-request
Repro: none
Affected version(s): Aspire 13.5.4 with .NET SDK 11.0.100-rc.1.26425.128 (latest Aspire: 13.5.4)
Severity: S4 — maintenance cleanup gated on a future SDK update; no current product failure is reported
Urgency: ⚪ backlog — no milestone
Reason: valid cleanup work, but it is dependency-gated and not important or actionable enough for 13.6
Suggested owner(s): Mitch Denny (@mitchdenny) (score 4), backup David Negstad (@danegsta) (score 2)
Evidence:
aspire updatebreaks project with Central Package Management (13.1.3) #15476 as completed inarea-acquisition(last 180d)area-acquisition(last 180d)Confidence: medium
Needs human?: no