4 packages from diskuv/dkml-install-api at 0.5.2

[jonahbeckford]

This pull-request concerns:
-dkml-install.0.5.2: API and registry for DkML installation components
-dkml-install-installer.0.5.2: Build tools for DkML installers
-dkml-install-runner.0.5.2: Runner executable for DkML installation
-dkml-package-console.0.5.2: Console setup and uninstall executables for DkML installation

---

• Homepage: https://github.com/diskuv/dkml-install-api
• Source repo: git+https://github.com/diskuv/dkml-install-api.git
• Bug tracker: https://github.com/diskuv/dkml-install-api/issues

---

🐫 Pull-request generated by opam-publish v2.1.0

[haochenx]

CI had a few cancelled jobs which I restarted.

I'm not entirely sure the inline comment needs to be addressed, and if it does need address, why its not caught by linter on this PR.

@raphael-proust @mseri please take a look and advice

[haochenx]

Likely missing

Suggested change

	"dune" {>= "2.9"}
	"ocaml" {>= "4.10"}
	"dune" {>= "2.9"}

as per #24577 pointed out. Maybe it's better to upstream this?

[jonahbeckford]

Why is ocaml.4.10+ necessary?

[haochenx]

I suggested ocaml.4.10+ only because it is so in dkml-install-runner.0.5.1. I don't have a strong opinion here.

It seems that the lower bound wasn't picked by you. As the CI is currently succeeding, we probably do not need this dependency. Yet there is a policy to have a dependency to ocaml, so it would be nice to add it like:

Suggested change

	"dune" {>= "2.9"}
	"ocaml"
	"dune" {>= "2.9"}

[jonahbeckford]

Clicked the Rebuild failed button because the failing jobs had "Cancelled" due to 120 minute timeout. Nothing to do with the PR; sounds like the CI machines were stalled for other reasons.

[mseri]

We did add the ocaml dependency because it was caught by the linter, but it was not essential since dkml-install already comes with an ocaml lower bound. The linter is no longer complaining about that, so I suggest we merge

[mseri]

Thanks to both of you