OCPBUGS-84536: Bump library-go by jubittajohn · Pull Request #2131 · openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator

jubittajohn · 2026-04-29T15:21:35Z

Bump library-go to consume the changes in openshift/library-go#2183

Signed-off-by: jubittajohn <jujohn@redhat.com>

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-04-29T15:21:44Z

@jubittajohn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Bump library-go to consume the changes in openshift/library-go#2183

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

coderabbitai · 2026-04-29T15:21:45Z

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: dbfcd7f6-875f-4241-ba91-37f012681a81

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

p0lyn0mial · 2026-04-29T15:28:46Z

4.22 hasn't been released yet, we can backport, this LGTM

/lgtm

p0lyn0mial · 2026-04-29T15:31:07Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

openshift-ci · 2026-04-29T15:32:07Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jubittajohn, p0lyn0mial

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [p0lyn0mial]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

jubittajohn · 2026-04-29T19:58:55Z

/retest-required

jubittajohn · 2026-04-29T20:27:10Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-04-29T20:27:15Z

@jubittajohn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

jubittajohn · 2026-04-29T20:27:51Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-04-29T20:27:57Z

@jubittajohn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

jubittajohn · 2026-04-29T20:30:20Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-04-29T20:30:25Z

@jubittajohn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536, which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62792 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead
expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62792 to target a version in 5.0.0, but it targets "5.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

jubittajohn · 2026-04-30T03:58:16Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

openshift-ci · 2026-04-30T05:52:19Z

@jubittajohn: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-perf-single-node	`a1b09a2`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-perf-single-node`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-single-node	`a1b09a2`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-single-node`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-kms	`a1b09a2`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-kms`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-rotation-single-node	`a1b09a2`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-rotation-single-node`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

jubittajohn · 2026-04-30T16:33:43Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-04-30T16:33:50Z

@jubittajohn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62792 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62792 targets the "5.0.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.0.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci · 2026-04-30T16:33:59Z

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: wangke19.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

@jubittajohn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)

bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)

bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

release note text is set and does not match the template

dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62792 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)

dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62792 targets the "5.0.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.0.0

bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

jubittajohn · 2026-04-30T16:36:47Z

/verified by ci

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-04-30T16:36:59Z

@jubittajohn: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

jubittajohn · 2026-04-30T16:37:30Z

/hold

benluddy · 2026-04-30T17:56:01Z

/test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-aescbc

jubittajohn · 2026-05-04T10:16:45Z

/hold cancel

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-05-04T10:19:41Z

@jubittajohn: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84536 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bump library-go to consume the changes in openshift/library-go#2183

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-merge-robot · 2026-05-05T06:16:53Z

Fix included in release 4.22.0-0.nightly-2026-05-04-220841

Bump library-go

a1b09a2

Signed-off-by: jubittajohn <jujohn@redhat.com>

openshift-ci Bot requested review from benluddy and sanchezl April 29, 2026 15:24

openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 29, 2026

openshift-ci Bot assigned gangwgr and p0lyn0mial Apr 29, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 29, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 29, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 30, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Apr 30, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 30, 2026

openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 4, 2026

openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit d03062f into openshift:release-4.22 May 4, 2026
20 of 24 checks passed

coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request May 12, 2026

NO-JIRA: add more rotation tests scenarios #2149

Closed

dustman9000 mentioned this pull request May 12, 2026

[sig-cluster-lifecycle] CSR approver test fails with 401 Unauthorized on ROSA STS clusters in 4.22+ openshift/origin#31163

Open

Uh oh!

Conversation

jubittajohn commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Review skipped

Uh oh!

p0lyn0mial commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

p0lyn0mial commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 29, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

benluddy commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

jubittajohn commented May 4, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 4, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-robot commented May 5, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 30, 2026 •

edited

Loading