chore(deps): update module gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4 to v5

[red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh03]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4	v4.13.0 → v5.9.11

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone UTC)

• Branch creation
  • Between 02:00 AM and 04:59 AM, Monday through Friday (* 2-4 * * 1-5)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

To execute skipped test pipelines write comment /ok-to-test.

---

Documentation

Find out how to configure dependency updates in MintMaker documentation or see all available configuration options in Renovate documentation.

[openshift-ci]

Hi @red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh03[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh03[bot]
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ajpantuso for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[fullsend-ai-retro]

🤖 Finished Retro · ✅ Success · Started 8:03 AM UTC · Completed 8:12 AM UTC

Commit: f2e50cb · View workflow run →

[fullsend-ai-retro]

Retro: PR #295 — Bot dependency update with zero agent interaction

PR #295 was an automated dependency update from MintMaker/Renovate (red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh03[bot]) attempting a major version bump of gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch from v4 to v5. The PR changed a single line in go.mod. All 7 required Prow CI checks failed (the major version bump requires corresponding go.sum updates and potentially code changes for API differences). No human ever reviewed or commented. The PR sat open for ~2 months (Jun 17 – Aug 14) before the bot autoclosed it.

Agent involvement: none. The fullsend routing logic correctly skipped the review agent because the bot author lacks triage permission on the repo — a deliberate security gate (ADR 0054). The only agent that ran was this retro, triggered by the PR close event. This retro itself is an instance of the waste pattern: a retro agent consuming compute to analyze a bot PR with zero prior agent interaction and zero human interaction, producing no actionable findings.

No new proposals filed — all candidate improvements are covered by existing open issues:

• Skip retro for zero-agent-involvement bot PRs: Covered by fullsend-ai/fullsend #5943, #5295, #3833, #4006, and 8+ additional issues. Meta-issue #5817 proposes consolidating these 22+ overlapping issues into a single design issue.
• Review agent routing for bot-authored PRs: Covered by #1371, #5757, #5777, and 12+ additional issues.
• Agent analysis of dependency update PRs: Covered by #4594 (verify multi-module Go dependency update completeness), #3049 (surface breaking-change warnings), #4293 (fast-path bot dependency PRs), and others.

This PR provides additional evidence for #5943 (skip retro dispatch for unmerged PRs with zero fullsend agent involvement) — the retro agent consumed compute to analyze a PR where there was nothing to analyze. Resolving that issue would have prevented this retro from running at all.

[fullsend-ai-retro]

🤖 Finished Retro · ✅ Success · Started 8:04 AM UTC · Completed 8:11 AM UTC

Commit: 7a7cb23 · View workflow run →

Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-6 · Effort: high · Cost: $1.95

[fullsend-ai-retro]

Retro: PR #295 — Second retro on bot dependency PR, reinforcing known waste pattern

PR #295 was an automated dependency update from MintMaker/Renovate (red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh03[bot]) attempting a major version bump of gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch from v4 to v5. The change was a single incomplete line in go.mod (no go.sum update, no code changes for API differences). All 7 required Prow CI checks failed. No human ever reviewed or commented. No fullsend agents (triage, code, review, fix) were dispatched — the routing logic correctly skipped them because the bot author lacks triage permission.

This is the second retro on this PR. The PR was autoclosed on 2026-08-14, triggering the first retro which completed in ~9 minutes and correctly identified this as a waste pattern. The Renovate bot then reopened and rebased the PR (commit changed from f2e50cb to 7a7cb23). The PR was autoclosed again on 2026-09-14, triggering this second retro (run 34820793104), which arrived at the same conclusion — doubling the compute cost for zero analytical value.

No new proposals filed. All candidate improvements are already covered by existing open issues:

• Skip retro for zero-agent bot PRs: fullsend-ai/fullsend #5943 and 22+ related issues consolidated under meta-issue #5817. This retro is additional evidence — the reopen-rebase-reclose cycle caused a second retro dispatch on the same PR with no new agent activity to analyze.
• Suppress Renovate major-version bumps for indirect Go deps: #342 in the source repo. PR chore(deps): update module gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4 to v5 #295 follows the exact pattern described in that issue (stale, unmergeable major-version bump on an indirect dependency). Resolving Suppress Renovate major-version bumps for indirect Go module dependencies #342 would prevent these PRs from being created.
• Stop hook fires on read-only agent roles: #359 in the source repo. During this retro run, the stop hook repeatedly attempted prek validation despite the retro agent making no code changes, adding noise to the analysis.
• Review agent routing for bot-authored PRs: fullsend-ai/fullsend #1371, #5757, #5777. The routing correctly skipped review/code/fix agents here, but these issues track broader improvements to bot-PR handling.

Agents repo: fullsend-ai/agents@v0 (commit 6bdcab69), resolved from workflow run logs.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 35f62b62-f774-4ce0-9e78-2bcba5f992a9

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[openshift-ci]

@red-hat-konflux-kflux-prd-rh03[bot]: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/lint	c77f126	link	true	/test lint
ci/prow/images	c77f126	link	true	/test images
ci/prow/coverage	c77f126	link	true	/test coverage
ci/prow/osd-gcp-e2e	c77f126	link	true	/test osd-gcp-e2e
ci/prow/test	c77f126	link	true	/test test
ci/prow/rosa-sts-e2e	c77f126	link	true	/test rosa-sts-e2e
ci/prow/validate	c77f126	link	true	/test validate

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.