fix: prevent destructive overwrite of decompression directories

[fzlzjerry]

Closes #1043.

Summary

• remove the destructive overwrite choice when a decompression conflict target is a directory
• keep rename, merge, and skip for directory conflicts while preserving overwrite for actual file conflicts
• update the multi-format merge coverage and add regressions for preserving unrelated directory contents and overwriting a single-file target
• document the fix in the changelog

Validation

• cargo test --locked
• cargo test --locked --no-default-features
• cargo test --locked --no-default-features --features unrar,use_zlib,use_zstd_thin
• cargo clippy --locked --all-targets -- -D warnings
• cargo clippy --locked --no-default-features --all-targets -- -D warnings
• cargo +nightly fmt -- --check

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[marcospb19]

review requested due to automatic review settings

wat, uh, oke, Imma ignore that

[marcospb19]

remove the destructive overwrite choice when a decompression conflict target is a directory

Did you choose that by accident and had an unintended deletion? Do you think the conflict message was confusing and could be improved?

[fzlzjerry]

No, I did not lose data myself; I reproduced the behavior reported in #1043. The prompt says overwrite, but for an explicit --dir it does not make clear that this recursively removes the entire existing destination, including unrelated contents. The reporter expected archive collisions to be overwritten and lost unrelated projects, which is why I removed the directory-level option. If you prefer to keep it, I can narrow the patch to an explicit destructive warning/confirmation instead.

[marcospb19]

I was thinking of renaming it to delete instead of overwrite so that we didn't remove the capability of deleting it.

But maybe you're right, we should just remove any possibility of messing up while using ouch, even if that means requiring the user to manually run some rm in corner cases.

[marcospb19]

I rebased and now CI is failing, I'll be trying to fix.

[marcospb19]

Thanks!