Add a LICENSE#503
Open
darkexplosiveqwx wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: darkexplosiveqwx <101737077+darkexplosiveqwx@users.noreply.github.com>
yubiuser
approved these changes
May 3, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
I think we should leave this open for a couple weeks to give contributors some time to explicitly approve or deny the re-license. |
rdwebdesign
approved these changes
May 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for your contribution to the Pi-hole Community!
Please read the comments below to help us consider your Pull Request.
We are all volunteers and completing the process outlined will help us review your commits quicker.
Please make sure you
What does this PR aim to accomplish?:
provide clarity about the licensing of PADD
I'm going with EUPL 1.2, as the rest of Pi-hole uses it.
How does this PR accomplish the above?:
Adds a LICENSE, in similar style as core, FTL and web
Adds the license header, similar to core and FTL.
Technically, when PADD had no LICENSE file it counts as "All rights reserved".
Therefore, this is considered a re-license and needs approval from all contributors.
Fron git commit metadata:
I think it would be good to have as many contributors as possible agree to this change and possibly mention the ones not explicitly agreeing in LICENSE (similar as it has been done with core and web)
Should I go ahead and ping everyone's GitHub for this?
By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:
git rebase)