Skip to content

v0.2.0: inbox write path, Homebrew formula, benchmark by question type - #8

Merged
puretensor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ultra21/pt-2285-inbox
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

puretensor merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ultra21/pt-2285-inbox

Conversation

@puretensor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds the v0.2 items:

  • Inbox write path. New MCP tool puremind_propose(title, content) saves a proposal in ~/.puremind/inbox/ (outside the vault, mode 0600) and does nothing else. puremind inbox (list, show, approve, reject) is the only way a note gets created: it shows the proposal, asks at a terminal (--yes otherwise), and creates a new file only (no overwrite, no symlink traversal, no hidden/../absolute paths). Caps: 200-char title, 20,000-char content, 100 pending. serve --read-only and [inbox] enabled = false remove the tool. README, SECURITY and CONTRIBUTING updated, including the honest limit that an agent with a shell could pass --yes.
  • Homebrew formula in packaging/homebrew/puremind.rb, for use from a tap of your own (no public tap). Installed and brew tested on an Apple Silicon Mac; brew style and brew audit --new clean.
  • Benchmark results by question type in the README (Recall@5 and judged QA for the six LongMemEval types, aggregates only; the claude-mem comparison table is unchanged).

Version 0.2.0 is in the changelog as unreleased; no tag or release is made here.

Tests: 683 passed, 9 skipped on Apple M5 Pro (arm64, Python 3.13, real torch); 674 passed, 18 skipped on Linux; ruff clean; gitleaks clean.

… formula, benchmark results by question type

Agents can propose a memory through the new MCP tool puremind_propose; it only saves a file in
~/.puremind/inbox/. `puremind inbox approve` is the one step that creates a note, and it only
creates (no overwrite, no symlink traversal, no hidden or absolute paths). `serve --read-only` and
`[inbox] enabled = false` remove the tool. packaging/homebrew/puremind.rb is a formula for use from
a tap of your own (installed and brew-tested on an Apple Silicon Mac). The README gets Recall@5 and
judged QA per LongMemEval question type for this design.
@puretensor
puretensor merged commit 799d5cf into main Oct 22, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant