Fix key prop warning - #999
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 40 minutes Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
4aa9f98 to
7a4f379
Compare
0d7bdb8 to
a3f0d33
Compare
7a4f379 to
60cb43c
Compare
a3f0d33 to
f8a018d
Compare
Co-Authored-By: Amp <amp@ampcode.com> Amp-Thread-ID: https://ampcode.com/threads/T-019fec69-19ab-77e8-b6f0-85af1ed67eed Co-authored-by: Amp <amp@ampcode.com>
f8a018d to
1f9ef07
Compare
60cb43c to
0a1b132
Compare
Co-authored-by: Amp <amp@ampcode.com> Amp-Thread-ID: https://ampcode.com/threads/T-019fec69-19ab-77e8-b6f0-85af1ed67eed
Context & Requests for Reviewers
React returned a browser console warning because
keyis a reserved prop name. There's no need to pass it through like we were doing, it works fine without that.Tests
Tested manually.
(Optional) Rollout Plan
N/A
Checklist
Only check items that apply to this PR; leave the rest unchecked.
If you changed anything user-facing (i.e. user interface or APIs):
Did you update the CHANGELOG.md and related docs?
If you changed
server/models/**/{ContentTypeModel,ActionModel,RuleModel,PolicyModel}.ts:Did you update the corresponding history tables and their triggers?
If you changed
db/src/scripts/**and usedCREATE TABLE,ADD COLUMN, orALTER COLUMN:Are as many columns marked
NOT NULLas possible? If some columns can sometimes be null depending on other columns, are thereCHECKconstraints capturing those relationships, and are these also reflected using unions in the associated Kysely types?If you added a new signal in
server/services/signalsService/signals/**:Did you classify every error case as a permanent error (
SignalPermanentError, no retry) or a normal error (retryable)? Any case where the signal can't determine a score should be aSignalPermanentError.