Skip to content

chore: scaffold specs/ and specs/decisions/ (#39 T3) - #42

Merged
rsenna merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-39-t3-specs-dirs
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

chore: scaffold specs/ and specs/decisions/ (#39 T3)#42
rsenna merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-39-t3-specs-dirs

Conversation

@owkwo-bot

@owkwo-bot owkwo-bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

T3 of #39 (chore: adopt repo-standard, stage=in-progress): scaffolds empty specs/ and specs/decisions/ directories (with .gitkeep, since git doesn't track empty directories) for new spec-kit-format work and ADRs going forward. Existing docs/spec*.md/docs/design/*.md content is untouched -- this is scaffolding only.

Test plan

  • git status --porcelain shows only the two new .gitkeep files
  • Nothing under docs/ moved or modified
  • Independently reviewed via pr-review-toolkit:review-pr

Part of #39.

🧙 Built with WOZCODE


Summary by cubic

Scaffolded specs/ and specs/decisions/ directories with .gitkeep to prepare for spec-kit work and ADRs, part of #39. Existing docs/spec*.md and docs/design/*.md are unchanged.

Written for commit fad3557. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

T3 of issue #39: empty directories for new spec-kit-format work and
ADRs going forward, per the repo-standard design doc's in-progress
tier. Existing docs/spec*.md and docs/design/*.md content is not moved
here -- see that issue's Non-goals.

Co-Authored-By: WOZCODE <contact@withwoz.com>
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

owkwo-bot has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped as selected files did not have any reviewable changes.

💤 Files selected but had no reviewable changes (2)
  • specs/.gitkeep
  • specs/decisions/.gitkeep
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ae3aae98-8ada-4439-aa0f-d9820ab67775

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cc5e85 and fad3557.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • specs/.gitkeep
  • specs/decisions/.gitkeep

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 2 files

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

Re-trigger cubic

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

The pull request is intended to scaffold the specs/ and specs/decisions/ directories using .gitkeep files. However, the current change set is empty, and no files were detected in the analysis. Consequently, the acceptance criteria for directory creation have not been addressed. Although Codacy analysis indicates the PR is up to standards, the lack of implementation prevents this from being a functional contribution.

About this PR

  • The pull request contains no file changes. To satisfy the requirements, the .gitkeep files must be added to the specs/ and specs/decisions/ directories as described in the PR title.

Test suggestions

  • Verify 'specs/.gitkeep' creation and content
  • Verify 'specs/decisions/.gitkeep' creation and content
  • Verify 'docs/' directory integrity
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify 'specs/.gitkeep' creation and content
2. Verify 'specs/decisions/.gitkeep' creation and content
3. Verify 'docs/' directory integrity

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

@rsenna
rsenna merged commit 3feffa1 into main Aug 2, 2026
5 checks passed
@rsenna
rsenna deleted the issue-39-t3-specs-dirs branch August 2, 2026 17:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants