docs: clarify medical-use boundaries#878
Open
2023Anita wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Motivation
RuView's README introduces health-adjacent capabilities such as breathing rate, heart rate, fall risk, apnea screening, distress detection, and triage workflows very early. As a clinician/anesthesiologist reading the project, I think a short top-level boundary helps non-technical and clinical readers understand the intended use before trying the system in healthcare-adjacent scenarios.
This keeps the project positioning clear: research and ambient sensing first, not a regulated clinical monitoring device.
Verification
git diff --checkRisk
Docs-only change. No runtime behavior, APIs, models, or examples are changed.