Feedback for the slides

Adding suggestions coming from translations efforts which reveals that something can be improved:

slide 9: not connected to selling pint, also share to same issues
slide 7 is duplicate
slide 11: remove point with Siemens.
slide 24: should be 3rd party and own components
slide 24: "software clearing" better change it to "license analysis for software clearing"
slide 25: "component selection and approval workflow" not search list
slide 26: "Siemens internal fork" -> "use case for private fork"
slide 28: first bullet point: "focus is on inventory not on availability"
slide 33: mainline should be replaced with recommendation for use or for phase out
slide 48: "Real use case: ..." change to "Client use case have designed the API from their needs, no upfront API design"
slide 48: change last bullet point to have it buffering reduces load on server
slide 56: merge bullet point about fossology running with previous one

slide 27: update dependency version
slide 41: remove Codescoop
slide 42: if BlackDuck Protex (now Open Hub? Software Composition Analysis?) is still a valid integration, use the full name; if not, remove
slide 43: expand WS to full name
add any other new integrations
slide 63: clarify that SW360 is a proper Eclipse project now (not in incubation anymore)
slide 64: remove Antenna slide, as it’s deprecated

Navigation Menu