feat: Split l1 subscriber so we can start with(lead sequencer) or without(follower) deposit queue#677
Draft
adityapk00 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
feat: Split l1 subscriber so we can start with(lead sequencer) or without(follower) deposit queue#677adityapk00 wants to merge 1 commit into
adityapk00 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
adityapk00
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 17, 2026 16:28
adityapk00
marked this pull request as draft
July 17, 2026 16:29
adityapk00
force-pushed
the
aditya/split_l1_sub
branch
from
July 17, 2026 16:29
b753082 to
897a98f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[Draft]
Followers need to monitor L1 blocks, but they skip deposit enquing because they rely on the leader to process deposits in the blocks. Split the L1 subscriber so it can allow for both use cases.