docs(submission): verified Cursor + Copilot marketplace steps and status

[ophiocus]

Addresses #48 — the two channels the issue names get the same exact-steps treatment SUBMISSION.md already gives OpenAI, from a verification pass done today (2026-08-29). The actual submissions stay owner-gated (Cursor's form is owner-only; the awesome-copilot redo belongs to the original submitter), so this PR ships everything an outside contributor can: the verified path, the package-compliance check, and the true current status.

Cursor (per cursor.com/docs/reference/plugins and the marketplace announcement):

• Submission = owner submits the public repo link at cursor.com/marketplace/publish; every listing and every update is manually reviewed; marketplace plugins must be open source (we are).
• fullstack-dev-kit ✅ complies with the naming rules; logos are committed in assets/ (relative-path reference is the requirement to double-check).
• One real question flagged rather than guessed: our repo root carries .cursor-plugin/marketplace.json (a marketplace), while the portable root plugin.json lives inside plugins/fullstack-dev-kit/ — whether the publish form accepts a marketplace repo or wants a root manifest needs confirming at submission time.

VS Code / Copilot (per the GitHub changelog, 2026-08-12 and VS Code docs):

• Agent Plugins 1.0 is GA on all Copilot plans; @agentPlugins browses the configured marketplaces, and github/awesome-copilot is one of the two defaults — so listing there is the "surfaces under @agentPlugins" checkbox, no VSIX or publisher account involved.
• Status honestly recorded: the 08-20 intake (#2730) was closed to redo via the official web form, and as of today fullstack-dev-kit isn't listed and no new intake exists — the web-form resubmission is the one open action, and it's yours to fire whenever you're ready.

The channels table and Next actions are updated to match. Happy to adjust anything — and if it helps, I can prep the awesome-copilot form answers from #2730's body so the redo is a two-minute paste.

[vercel]

@ophiocus is attempting to deploy a commit to the Monkeys' projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[atamanvega]

Thanks @ophiocus — the step-by-step research (Cursor publish rules, awesome-copilot external-plugin flow, the @agentPlugins discovery path) is solid and worth having in SUBMISSION.md. Two status corrections, using events from the last few days you wouldn't have had visibility into:

1. Cursor — already submitted, no open manifest question. The owner submitted the public repo link at cursor.com/marketplace/publish and the form accepted our root .cursor-plugin/marketplace.json → subdir plugin (so the "❓ confirm whether the publish form accepts a marketplace repo / may need a root single-plugin manifest" is resolved — it accepted it). It's in manual review now (not yet listed). Please reflect: Cursor = submitted, in review.

2. Awesome Copilot — already resubmitted via web form, and rejected. #2731 was the web-form resubmission (not another CLI attempt): it passed automated intake on 08-20, then a maintainer rejected it on 2026-08-26 on curation grounds — their words: the skills are "either overly simplistic … or replicate functionality built into the harness (such as the issue/PR skills)." So there is no open 'resubmit via web form' action — it was submitted and declined. Copilot still works today via install-from-source (verified; README documents it).

Could you update the Status/open-actions sections to: Cursor = submitted/in-review, Awesome Copilot = rejected 2026-08-26 (curation), no further action, Copilot = install-from-source works? The rest is great. 🙏

[ophiocus]

Both corrected in dff7fed — thank you for the visibility I couldn't have had from outside:

• Cursor now reads submitted, in manual review, and the manifest-location question is recorded as resolved in practice (the form accepted the marketplace repo as-is — good to know their intake handles that shape).
• Awesome Copilot now records #2731 as the web-form submission and the 2026-08-26 curation decline, quoting their grounds, with install-from-source as the working path today. I also framed any future re-approach as starting from the curation feedback rather than a resubmission — happy to adjust if you see that differently.

[atamanvega]

Thanks @ophiocus — status corrected accurately: Cursor submitted/in-review, awesome-copilot declined 2026-08-26 (curation) with no open action, Copilot via install-from-source. Merging. 🙏