Port "author choice" for logo contrast exception to (text) contrast; add cross-reference from text to non-text for graphic/symbol use - #5297
Conversation
This is irrelevant for contrast requirements
…er text into a separate, clearer paragraph
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
f13f3ea to
f07e6e0
Compare
|
I don't think the |
actually, the whole point there is that those buttons don't count as text (enhanced or otherwise), so 3:1 IS correct for them. the wording needs to make it clear that they fall under 1.4.11 and THERE they pass the requirements |
f0b1fce to
b078a68
Compare
…example of text characters acting as graphical symbols
61a2e19 to
8369935
Compare
Co-authored-by: Adam Page <adamfpage@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Page <adamfpage@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Page <adamfpage@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
| contrast requirements.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <p>If logos normally have sufficient contrast but are presented with an insufficient contrast as an author choice, | ||
| rather than because of corporate identity or brand guidelines, then that particular low contrast |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just to play devil's advocate, how would we treat cases where the CI brand guidelines demonstrably say, "In the footer or our product pages, the corporate logo is to be rendered in a muted grey with a contrast of 2:1"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
then that's set by the CI which is exempted (because poor web devs can't go against the wishes of their silly branding team)
5 participants
This is a follow-up to #4402
Previews:
Diffs: