A comprehensive suite of Claude Code skills for academic research, covering the full pipeline from research to publication.
- Deep Research — 13-agent research team with Socratic guided mode + systematic review / PRISMA
- Academic Paper — 12-agent paper writing with LaTeX output hardening, visualization, revision coaching, and citation conversion
- Academic Paper Reviewer — Multi-perspective peer review with 0-100 quality rubrics (EIC + 3 dynamic reviewers + Devil's Advocate)
- Academic Pipeline — Full 10-stage pipeline orchestrator with adaptive checkpoints, claim verification, and material passport
Research → Write → Integrity Check → Review (5-person) → Socratic Coaching
→ Revise → Re-Review → Re-Revise → Final Integrity Check → Finalize
→ Process Summary (with Collaboration Quality Evaluation)
Key Features:
- Adaptive checkpoints (FULL / SLIM / MANDATORY) after every stage
- Pre-review integrity verification — 100% reference, data, and claim validation (Phase A-E)
- Two-stage review with Devil's Advocate + 0-100 quality rubrics
- Socratic revision coaching between review and revision stages
- Final integrity verification before publication
- Output: MD + DOCX + LaTeX (APA 7.0
apa7class / IEEE / Chicago) → PDF via tectonic - Post-pipeline process summary with 6-dimension collaboration quality scoring (1–100)
- Material passport for mid-entry provenance tracking
- Cross-skill mode advisor (14 scenarios + user archetypes)
See the complete artifacts from a real 10-stage pipeline run — including peer review reports, integrity verification reports, and the final paper:
Browse all pipeline artifacts →
| Artifact | Description |
|---|---|
| Final Paper (EN) | APA 7.0 formatted, LaTeX-compiled |
| Final Paper (ZH) | Chinese version, APA 7.0 |
| Integrity Report — Pre-Review | Stage 2.5: caught 15 fabricated refs + 3 statistical errors |
| Integrity Report — Final | Stage 4.5: zero regressions confirmed |
| Peer Review Round 1 | EIC + 3 Reviewers + Devil's Advocate |
| Re-Review | Verification after revisions |
| Peer Review Round 2 | Follow-up review |
| Response to Reviewers | Point-by-point author response |
Recommended model: Claude Opus 4.6 with Max plan (or equivalent extended-thinking configuration).
The full academic pipeline (10 stages) consumes a large amount of tokens — a single end-to-end run can exceed 200K input + 100K output tokens depending on paper length and revision rounds. Use at your discretion and budget accordingly.
Individual skills (e.g.,
deep-researchalone, oracademic-paper-revieweralone) consume significantly less.
Recommended: Native installer (no Node.js required, auto-updates):
# macOS / Linux
curl -fsSL https://claude.ai/install.sh | bash
# Windows (PowerShell)
irm https://claude.ai/install.ps1 | iexAlternative: npm install (deprecated)
Requires Node.js 18+.
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-codeYou need an Anthropic API key. Get one at https://console.anthropic.com/
# Claude Code will prompt for your API key on first run
claudeOr set it as an environment variable:
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-xxxxxClone this repo into your project's .claude/skills/ directory:
# Navigate to your project root
cd /path/to/your/project
# Create skills directory if it doesn't exist
mkdir -p .claude/skills
# Clone the skills
git clone https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git .claude/skills/academic-research-skillsThen copy the .claude/CLAUDE.md content into your project's .claude/CLAUDE.md (merge with existing if you have one).
Global installation: To make skills available across all your projects, install to
~/.claude/skills/instead:mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills git clone https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/academic-research-skills
# Clone the repo
git clone https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git
# Navigate to the project
cd academic-research-skills
# Start Claude Code
claudeDon't have Git? Download as ZIP instead
- Go to https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
- Click the green Code button → Download ZIP
- Extract the ZIP to your desired location
- For Method 1: move the extracted folder to
.claude/skills/academic-research-skillsinside your project - For standalone use: open a terminal in the extracted folder and run
claude
Use these skills in Claude Cowork — Claude Desktop's agentic workspace for knowledge work.
Option A: Folder Access (Quickest)
- Clone this repo to a local folder:
git clone https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git ~/academic-research-skills - Open Claude Desktop → click Cowork tab (top bar)
- Select the cloned
academic-research-skillsfolder as the working directory - Claude will auto-detect the skills from
SKILL.mdfiles and load them as needed
Option B: As Project Skills
If you already have a project folder in Cowork:
cd /path/to/your/project
mkdir -p .claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git .claude/skills/academic-research-skillsSkills will auto-load when relevant to your conversation — e.g., saying "help me write a paper" triggers academic-paper.
Requirements:
- Claude Desktop (latest version) with Cowork enabled
- Paid plan (Pro, Max, Team, or Enterprise)
You can load these skills via claude.ai's Project feature without installing Claude Code.
Steps:
-
Download all 4
SKILL.mdfiles from this repo:deep-research/SKILL.mdacademic-paper/SKILL.mdacademic-paper-reviewer/SKILL.mdacademic-pipeline/SKILL.md
-
Sign in to claude.ai
-
Create a new Project:
- Click Projects → Create Project in the sidebar
- Name it "Academic Research" (or any name you prefer)
-
Upload SKILL.md files:
- Open the Project → click Project Knowledge (right panel)
- Click Add Content → Upload Files
- Upload all 4
SKILL.mdfiles
-
(Optional) Upload reference and template files for better results:
- Files under
deep-research/references/(APA guide, methodology templates, etc.) - Files under
academic-paper/references/(citation formats, writing style, etc.) - Files under
academic-paper/templates/(paper structure templates)
- Files under
-
Start chatting: Open a new conversation in the Project and say "Guide my research on X" or "Help me write a paper"
claude.ai Limitations:
- Project Knowledge file size limit: 200KB per file
versionandlast_updatedin SKILL.md YAML frontmatter must be undermetadata:, otherwise upload will fail- claude.ai does not support parallel multi-agent execution; results may not be as comprehensive as Claude Code
- Recommended: upload at least 4 SKILL.md files + core references for best results
# Start a full research pipeline
You: "I want to write a research paper on AI's impact on higher education QA"
# Start with Socratic guidance
You: "Guide my research on AI in educational evaluation"
# Write a paper with guided planning
You: "Guide me through writing a paper on demographic decline"
# Review an existing paper
You: "Review this paper" (then provide the paper)
# Check pipeline status
You: "status"
"Research the impact of AI on higher education" → full mode
"Give me a quick brief on X" → quick mode
"Do a systematic review on X with PRISMA" → systematic-review mode (new)
"Guide my research on X" → socratic mode (guided)
"Fact-check these claims" → fact-check mode
"Do a literature review on X" → lit-review mode
"Review this paper's research quality" → review mode
"Write a paper on X" → full mode
"Guide me through writing a paper" → plan mode (guided)
"I have a draft, here are reviewer comments" → revision mode
"Parse these reviewer comments into a roadmap" → revision-coach mode (new)
"Convert to LaTeX" / "Convert citations to IEEE" → format-convert mode
"Check citations" → citation-check mode
"Write a bilingual abstract" → bilingual-abstract mode
"Polish my writing style" → writing-polish mode
"Write the full paper autonomously" → full-auto mode
"Review this paper" → full mode (EIC + R1/R2/R3 + Devil's Advocate)
"Quick assessment of this paper" → quick mode
"Guide me to improve this paper" → guided mode
"Check the methodology" → methodology-focus mode
"Verify the revisions" → re-review mode
"I want to write a complete research paper" → full pipeline from Stage 1
"I already have a paper, review it" → mid-entry at Stage 2.5 (integrity first)
"I received reviewer comments" → mid-entry at Stage 4
Pipeline ends with Stage 6: Process Summary — auto-generates a paper creation process record with 6-dimension Collaboration Quality Evaluation (1–100 scoring).
- Traditional Chinese (繁體中文) — default when user writes in Chinese
- English — default when user writes in English
- Bilingual abstracts (Chinese + English) for academic papers
- APA 7.0 (default, including Chinese citation rules)
- Chicago (Notes & Author-Date)
- MLA
- IEEE
- Vancouver
- IMRaD (empirical research)
- Thematic Literature Review
- Theoretical Analysis
- Case Study
- Policy Brief
- Conference Paper
13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research:
| Agent | Role |
|---|---|
| Research Question Agent | FINER-scored RQ formulation |
| Research Architect | Methodology design |
| Bibliography Agent | Systematic literature search |
| Source Verification Agent | Evidence grading, predatory journal detection |
| Synthesis Agent | Cross-source integration |
| Report Compiler | APA 7.0 report drafting |
| Editor-in-Chief | Q1 journal editorial review |
| Devil's Advocate | Assumption challenging (3 checkpoints) |
| Ethics Review Agent | AI disclosure, attribution integrity |
| Socratic Mentor | Guided research dialogue with convergence criteria |
| Risk of Bias Agent | RoB 2 + ROBINS-I assessment, traffic-light output |
| Meta-Analysis Agent | Effect sizes, heterogeneity, forest plot data, GRADE |
| Monitoring Agent | Post-pipeline literature monitoring alerts |
Modes: full, quick, paper-review, lit-review, fact-check, socratic, systematic-review (new)
12-agent pipeline for academic paper writing:
| Agent | Role |
|---|---|
| Intake Agent | Configuration interview + handoff detection |
| Literature Strategist | Search strategy + annotated bibliography |
| Structure Architect | Paper outline + word allocation |
| Argument Builder | Thesis + claim-evidence chains |
| Draft Writer | Section-by-section writing |
| Citation Compliance | Multi-format citation audit + APA↔Chicago↔MLA↔IEEE↔Vancouver conversion |
| Abstract Bilingual | EN + Chinese abstracts |
| Peer Reviewer | 5-dimension review (max 2 rounds) |
| Formatter | LaTeX/DOCX/PDF output — mandatory apa7 class, XeCJK bilingual, ragged2e justification fix, tectonic compilation |
| Socratic Mentor | Chapter-by-chapter guided planning with convergence criteria |
| Visualization Agent | 9 chart types, matplotlib/ggplot2, APA 7.0 standards |
| Revision Coach Agent | Parses unstructured reviewer comments → Revision Roadmap |
Modes: full, plan, revision, citation-check, format-convert, bilingual-abstract, writing-polish, full-auto, revision-coach (new)
7-agent multi-perspective review with 0-100 quality rubrics:
| Agent | Role |
|---|---|
| Field Analyst | Identifies domain, configures reviewer personas |
| Editor-in-Chief | Journal fit, novelty, significance |
| Methodology Reviewer | Research design, statistics, reproducibility |
| Domain Reviewer | Literature coverage, theoretical framework |
| Perspective Reviewer | Cross-disciplinary, practical impact |
| Devil's Advocate Reviewer | Core thesis challenge, logical fallacy detection, strongest counter-argument |
| Editorial Synthesizer | Consensus analysis, revision roadmap, rubric-based scoring |
Modes: full, re-review (verification), quick, methodology-focus, guided
Decision mapping: ≥80 Accept, 65-79 Minor Revision, 50-64 Major Revision, <50 Reject
10-stage orchestrator with integrity verification, two-stage review, Socratic coaching, and collaboration evaluation:
| Stage | Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. RESEARCH | deep-research | Clarify RQ, find literature |
| 2. WRITE | academic-paper | Draft the paper |
| 2.5. INTEGRITY | integrity_verification_agent | 100% reference & data verification |
| 3. REVIEW | academic-paper-reviewer | 5-person review (EIC + R1/R2/R3 + Devil's Advocate) |
| → | Socratic Revision Coaching | Guide user through review feedback |
| 4. REVISE | academic-paper | Address review comments |
| 3'. RE-REVIEW | academic-paper-reviewer | Verification review of revisions |
| → | Socratic Residual Coaching | Guide user through remaining issues (if Major) |
| 4'. RE-REVISE | academic-paper | Final revision (if needed) |
| 4.5. FINAL INTEGRITY | integrity_verification_agent | 100% final verification (zero issues required) |
| 5. FINALIZE | academic-paper | Ask format style → MD + DOCX + LaTeX → tectonic → PDF |
| 6. PROCESS SUMMARY | pipeline | Paper creation process record + Collaboration Quality Evaluation (1–100) |
Pipeline guarantees:
- Every stage requires user confirmation checkpoint
- Integrity verification (Stage 2.5 + 4.5) cannot be skipped
- Reproducible — standardized process with full audit trail
- Post-pipeline collaboration evaluation with honest, evidence-based scoring
This work is licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes
Attribution format:
Based on Academic Research Skills by Cheng-I Wu
https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Cheng-I Wu (吳政宜)
- deep-research v2.3: New systematic-review / PRISMA mode (7th); 3 new agents (risk_of_bias, meta_analysis, monitoring); PRISMA protocol/report templates; Socratic convergence criteria (4 signals + auto-end); Quick Mode Selection Guide
- academic-paper v2.4: 2 new agents (visualization, revision_coach); revision tracking template with 4 status types; citation format conversion (APA↔Chicago↔MLA↔IEEE↔Vancouver); statistical visualization standards; Socratic convergence criteria; revision recovery example; LaTeX output hardening — mandatory
apa7document class, text justification fix (ragged2e+etoolbox), table column width formula, bilingual abstract centering, standardized font stack (Times New Roman + Source Han Serif TC VF + Courier New), PDF via tectonic only - academic-paper-reviewer v1.4: Quality rubrics with 0-100 scoring and behavioral indicators; decision mapping (≥80 Accept, 65-79 Minor, 50-64 Major, <50 Reject); Quick Mode Selection Guide
- academic-pipeline v2.6: Adaptive checkpoint system (FULL/SLIM/MANDATORY); Phase E Claim Verification in integrity checks; Material Passport for mid-entry provenance; cross-skill mode advisor (14 scenarios); team collaboration protocol; enhanced handoff schemas (9 schemas); integrity failure recovery example
- academic-pipeline v2.4: New Stage 6 PROCESS SUMMARY — auto-generates structured paper creation process record (MD → LaTeX → PDF, bilingual); mandatory final chapter: Collaboration Quality Evaluation with 6 dimensions scored 1–100 (Direction Setting, Intellectual Contribution, Quality Gatekeeping, Iteration Discipline, Delegation Efficiency, Meta-Learning), honest feedback, and improvement recommendations; pipeline expanded from 9 to 10 stages
- academic-pipeline v2.3: Stage 5 FINALIZE now prompts for formatting style (APA 7.0 / Chicago / IEEE); PDF must compile from LaTeX via
tectonic(no HTML-to-PDF); APA 7.0 usesapa7document class (manmode) with XeCJK for bilingual CJK support; font stack: Times New Roman + Source Han Serif TC VF + Courier New
- Cross-Agent Quality Alignment: unified definitions (peer-reviewed, currency rule, CRITICAL severity, source tier) across all agents
- deep-research v2.2: synthesis anti-patterns, Socratic auto-end conditions, DOI+WebSearch verification, enhanced ethics integrity check, mode transition matrix
- academic-paper v2.2: 4-level argument scoring, plagiarism screening, 2 new failure paths (F11 Desk-Reject Recovery, F12 Conference-to-Journal), Plan→Full mode conversion
- academic-paper-reviewer v1.3: DA vs R3 role boundaries, CRITICAL finding criteria, consensus classification (4/3/SPLIT/DA-CRITICAL), confidence score weighting, Asian & Regional Journals reference
- academic-pipeline v2.2: checkpoint confirmation semantics, mode switching matrix, failure fallback matrix, state ownership protocol, material version control
- Simplify 4 SKILL.md (-371 lines, -16.5%): remove cross-skill duplication, inline templates → file references, redundant routing tables, duplicate mode selection sections
- Fix revision loop cap contradiction between academic-paper and academic-pipeline
- academic-pipeline v2.0: 5→9 stages, mandatory integrity verification, two-stage review, Socratic revision coaching, reproducibility guarantees
- academic-paper-reviewer v1.1: +Devil's Advocate Reviewer (7th agent), +re-review mode (verification), +post-review Socratic coaching
- New agent:
integrity_verification_agent— 100% reference/data verification with audit trail - New agent:
devils_advocate_reviewer_agent— 8-dimension thesis challenger - Output order: MD + DOCX → ask LaTeX → confirm → PDF
- Initial release
- deep-research v2.0 (10 agents, 6 modes including socratic)
- academic-paper v2.0 (10 agents, 8 modes including plan)
- academic-paper-reviewer v1.0 (6 agents, 4 modes including guided)
- academic-pipeline v1.0 (orchestrator)