feat: pcp-messages protobuf#1266
Conversation
|
No concrete merge-blocking issues found in the PR diff. I checked the workspace wiring, proto paths, |
6f3731d to
53d253f
Compare
|
No concrete correctness, security, or regression issues found in the PR diff. I could not fully verify locally: |
|
No concrete merge-blocking issues found in the PR diff. I could not run |
|
I found no concrete merge-blocking issues in the PR diff. I could not run full verification in this environment: |
|
No concrete merge-blocking issues found in the PR diff. I couldn’t execute the new crate tests here because the read-only environment prevented rustup from creating temp files under |
|
I found no concrete merge-blocking issues in the changes introduced by this PR. Note: I couldn’t run the Rust checks locally because this sandbox is read-only/offline for the required toolchain/dependencies, so this is a static review of the diff. |
d5ef659 to
b61206e
Compare
|
No concrete merge-blocking issues found in the PR diff. I reviewed the new proto definitions, Rust |
Introduces protobuf definitions for pcp messages to be included in the pcp-package.