Skip to content

Per 10309 fix api best practice violations#801

Open
liam-lloyd wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
per-10309_fix_api_best_practice_violations
Open

Per 10309 fix api best practice violations#801
liam-lloyd wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
per-10309_fix_api_best_practice_violations

Conversation

@liam-lloyd

@liam-lloyd liam-lloyd commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This does two small changes to bring our API closer to compliance with our standards

  • add an id field to record objects (to replace the stuttering recordId, though that's retained for now)
  • add an itemType field to the items returned by GET /folders/{id}/children (which isn't strictly about following the standard but will make the API more friendly to callers

I'm working on other things as part of this ticket as well, but they're bigger changes so I decided to put up this PR separately.

Currently, record objects returned from our API have a recordId field.
This field should, accordingly to our API design principles, be called
id to avoid stuttering. This commit adds an id field to records and
marks the recordId field deprecated.
This commit adds an itemType field to the response objects from
/folder/{id}/children so callers of this endpoint can easily determine
whether any given item is a record or a folder.
@liam-lloyd liam-lloyd force-pushed the per-10309_fix_api_best_practice_violations branch from 6776f1f to 45bd2e7 Compare July 8, 2026 22:27
Currently, folder objects returned from our API have a folderId field.
This field should, accordingly to our API design principles, be called
id to avoid stuttering, and in fact it is called id in the
documentation. Thus, this commit adds an id field to folders. It leaves
the folderId field in place for backward compatibility (but does not add
it to the documentation).
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.56%. Comparing base (2376cf5) to head (c60abeb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #801   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.56%   98.56%           
=======================================
  Files         109      109           
  Lines        2783     2783           
  Branches      462      462           
=======================================
  Hits         2743     2743           
  Misses         36       36           
  Partials        4        4           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 98.56% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant