[xdCloudy]

What

Adds 150 confirmed PS5 3.20 libSceLibcInternal export declarations. The symbol/NID pairs match the local import-stub inventory and public PS5 3.20 export inventory. Every declaration uses the repository's parameterless unknown-signature convention and calls NotImplemented_nid_no_patch; these are for import resolution only and make no ABI claims. The technical-debt file records every export and NID.

Tested

• Rebased on upstream main at f26434afa36e58778a9ff4b948aea52dff19eb0c.
• After the literal-NID fix, all 150 source/debt pairs match tools/nid_names.py exactly.
• python -I tools/check_conventions.py --base upstream/main --head HEAD — passed locally.
• git diff --check upstream/main...HEAD — passed locally.
• The latest overlap bot could not compare shared CMake/debt paths with conflicting feat(libkernel): implement execv, execvp and execve process replacement #9669 and refactor(libSceLibcInternal): serve siginterrupt from libSceLibcInternal #10749. Their source changes are in process/signal implementation files, while this PR adds InventoryExports6.cpp; maintainers may still need to reconcile the shared CMake/debt sections.
• Windows MinGW compiled and linked the target on an earlier head, before this rebase and NID correction. The WSL reconfigure stalled in a linker probe. No current Windows or WSL build pass is claimed.
• Hosted platform/product build jobs are skipped for drafts; no full CI pass is claimed.

Checklist

• Based on current main; no other open PR implements the same functions
• One topic per PR; follow-ups go in a new PR
• No comments in code except technical debt
• Unimplemented paths throw (NotImplemented_nid_no_patch); silent stubs are listed under Silent stubs in their library's technical debt file
• No notes, investigation .md files or images added to the repository (attach them to this PR)
• New third-party code is a submodule built from source (not applicable)
• Generic behaviour, not specific to one title
• Depends on: feat(libSceLibcInternal): declare 150 more PS5 pending exports #9511, feat(aot): consolidate native ARM64 compiler, runtime and consumers #5021, test: organize library tests and label CTest suites #6044, feat(libSceLibcInternal): implement posix_spawn process creation and reaping #9133; preserve this PR's earlier declarations when reconciling later feat(libkernel): implement execv, execvp and execve process replacement #9669
• Fixes: none
• Unblocks: none
• GPUs tested: n/a
• AI-assisted: yes

[MarcZX10]

I checked the exact head: the source contains 150 unique export aliases, and every debt entry maps to one of those names with the NID recomputed by tools/nid_names.py. Exact-head whitespace and conventions checks pass. The hosted conventions, eligibility, report and labels checks pass; product build jobs are skipped for this draft. The MinGW/Ubuntu compile results in the description are therefore author-reported rather than hosted CI results. The documented CMake/debt overlap with #5021 and #6044 remains explicitly unresolved pending rebase, and #9511’s debt-file section needs a combined rebase as you noted.

I’ve noticed that asking you to hold this PR based on #5239 was unnecessary. It’s fine to keep submitting PRs; maintainers will handle them in due course. Please disregard my earlier request to hold it.

[xdCloudy]

Thanks for the exact-head audit. The shared CMake/debt comparisons with #5021 and #6044, and the combined debt-file ordering with #9511, remain unresolved on this branch. I am leaving this draft and will not present the earlier overlap/build checks as current; a current-main rebase and fresh exact NID/overlap/conventions/target-build checks are still required before review can proceed. I also saw the later clarification withdrawing the queue hold, so I am not treating #5239 as a blocker.

[xdCloudy]

Fresh NID/overlap audit against main at d6e7ab4 and 1,277 open PRs found no duplicate export names or library/NID collisions for this batch. The checker still cannot merge-compare shared libc CMake/debt files against #5021, #6044, #9133 and #9669 because those PR branches conflict with main. I compared the scope: this PR registers InventoryExports6.cpp and documents pending imports; #9133/#9669 modify process-spawn/exec behavior and tests, while #6044 reorganizes test registration. The changes are distinct, though the shared CMake/debt edits will need to be preserved together during integration.

[MarcZX10]

I’ve noticed that asking you to hold this PR was unnecessary. It’s fine to keep submitting PRs; maintainers will handle them in due course.

[MarcZX10]

I reviewed the exact head's export/debt consistency: InventoryExports6.cpp has 150 unique NIDs and 150 unique aliases; all 150 bodies call NotImplemented_nid_no_patch, and each NID is represented in the debt file. The declarations make no ABI claims, consistent with the stated import-resolution scope. Exact-head git diff --check and tools/check_conventions.py --base upstream/main --head upstream/pr-9665 pass. Hosted eligibility, conventions, intake, labels and report pass; product builds are skipped by policy. No implementation tests are applicable to these throwing declarations, and I have not run a full library build.

One integration blocker remains: against current upstream main 16319642a4c84e861188b75583ce853dfbe0a101, tools/check_main_sync.py --base upstream/main --head upstream/pr-9665 reports 4 commits ahead / 10 behind (merge base 9d6adeb55), with a clean merge. Please merge current main and rerun the NID/inventory, overlap and conventions checks on the resulting head. Preserve the overlapping CMake/debt contributions from #9511, #5021, #6044, #9133 and #9669, and update the dependency/order checklist if the integration order changes. This is a current-main integration request, not a queue-volume objection.

[xdCloudy]

On the current PR head, local conventions and diff checks pass, and check_main_sync.py reports 4 ahead / 0 behind current upstream/main (0db47b2) with a clean merge. The Windows and WSL libSceLibcInternal targets are up to date. The prior sync request referenced a different base SHA; the current base-sync check is clear. I am keeping this in draft until the shared CMake/debt ordering with #9511, #5021, #6044 and #9133 is reconciled; #9669 is later-opened and needs to preserve these declarations when its overlapping files are combined.

[github-actions]

Other open pull requests touch the same code. Merging one will break the other, or both implement the same thing. If this one builds on them, list them in Depends on.

Pull request	Conflicting files (lines on main)	Same exports	Same new files
PR 10392	docs/dev/debt/libSceLibcInternal.md L19-20
PR 10749	docs/dev/debt/libSceLibcInternal.md L10

Some comparisons could not be completed because a pull request conflicts with the base branch. Review these shared files manually before concluding that there is no overlap.

Pull request	Shared files not compared
PR 9669	core/libs/prx/libSceLibcInternal/CMakeLists.txt docs/dev/debt/libSceLibcInternal.md

[xdCloudy]

I applied the same literal-NID correction to this batch and rebased it on current upstream main. All 150 source/debt pairs match tools/nid_names.py. One entry shares a NID with the known _ZSt17iostream_categoryv ABI symbol; I renamed the local stub helper to avoid describing that evidenced symbol as unknown while keeping the inventory alias and NID unchanged. I am not claiming the built raw/patched-provider and import-resolution audit is complete yet.

[xdCloudy]

Relevant warning: the bot could not compare the shared CMake/debt paths against conflicting PRs #9669 and #10749. Those PRs change process/signal implementations in other source files; this PR adds the libc internal inventory declarations in InventoryExports6.cpp. I have not treated the skipped documentation/CMake comparison as proof of a clean full overlap audit; I am recording it for maintainers.

[xdCloudy]

This is rebased on current upstream main at f26434a. I corrected the literal NID issue across all 150 exports and audited all source/debt pairs against tools/nid_names.py (150/150). Current hosted conventions pass; product/platform builds are skipped. The full built raw/patched-provider import-resolution audit requested by Dean remains outstanding, and the bot cannot compare shared CMake/debt paths with conflicted #9669/#10749, so I am not claiming complete integration validation.

[xdCloudy]

I’ve closed my PRs because, based on my personal experience, I’ve decided I will no longer contribute to or update them. This decision is about my experience with the public community and is not directed at the maintainers or active reviewers, whose time and work I appreciate. Thank you for reviewing and discussing my contributions. I wish the project and its maintainers well.

[xdCloudy]

I’ve closed my PRs because, based on my personal experience, I’ve decided I will no longer contribute to or update them. This decision is about my experience with the public community and is not directed at the maintainers or active reviewers, whose time and work I appreciate. Thank you for reviewing and discussing my contributions. I wish the project and its maintainers well.